A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients

被引:219
作者
Buckhurst, P. J. [1 ]
Wolffsohn, J. S. [1 ]
Shah, S. [1 ]
Naroo, S. A. [1 ]
Davies, L. N. [1 ]
Berrow, E. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aston Univ, Sch Life & Hlth Sci, Ophthalm Res Grp, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER; ANTERIOR-CHAMBER DEPTH; LASER-DOPPLER INTERFEROMETRY; AXIAL LENGTH; EYE-LENGTH; IOLMASTER; ULTRASOUND; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1136/bjo.2008.156554
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background: A new commercially available optical low coherence reflectometry device (Lenstar, Haag-Streit or Allegro Biograph, Wavelight) provides high-resolution non-contact measurements of ocular biometry. The study evaluates the validity and repeatability of these measurements compared with current clinical instrumentation. Method: Measurements were taken with the LenStar and IOLMaster on 112 patients aged 41-96 years listed for cataract surgery. A subgroup of 21 patients also had A-scan applanation ultrasonography (OcuScan) performed. Intersession repeatability of the LenStar measurements was assessed on 32 patients Results: LenStar measurements of white-to-white were similar to the IOLMaster (average difference 0.06 (SD 0.03) D; p = 0.305); corneal curvature measurements were similar to the IOLMaster (average difference -0.04 (0.20) D; p = 0.240); anterior chamber depth measurements were significantly longer than the IOLMaster (by 0.10 (0.40) mm) and ultrasound (by 0.32 (0.62) mm; p<0.001); crystalline lens thickness measurements were similar to ultrasound (difference 0.16 (0.83) mm, p = 0.382); axial length measurements were significantly longer than the IOLMaster (by 0.01 (0.02) mm) but shorter than ultrasound (by 0.14 (0.15) mm; p<0.001). The LensStar was unable to take measurements due to dense media opacities in a similar number of patients to the IOLMaster (9-10%). The LenStar biometric measurements were found to be highly repeatable (variability <= 2% of average value). Conclusions: Although there were some statistical differences between ocular biometry measurements between the LenStar and current clinical instruments, they were not clinically significant. LenStar measurements were highly repeatable and the instrument easy to use.
引用
收藏
页码:949 / 953
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [2] BUTCHER J M, 1991, Eye (London), V5, P708
  • [3] IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases
    Eleftheriadis, H
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 87 (08) : 960 - 963
  • [4] Refractive and visual outcome of hyperopic cataract cases operated on before and after implementation of the Holladay II formula
    Fenzl, RE
    Gills, JP
    Cherchio, M
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 105 (09) : 1759 - 1764
  • [5] EYE-LENGTH MEASUREMENT BY INTERFEROMETRY WITH PARTIALLY COHERENT-LIGHT
    FERCHER, AF
    MENGEDOHT, K
    WERNER, W
    [J]. OPTICS LETTERS, 1988, 13 (03) : 186 - 188
  • [6] The impact of cataract severity on measurement acquisition with the IOLMaster
    Freeman, G
    Pesudovs, K
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 83 (04): : 439 - 442
  • [7] National Biometry Audit
    Gale, RP
    Saha, N
    Johnston, RL
    [J]. EYE, 2004, 18 (01) : 63 - 66
  • [8] Evaluation of a new IOLMaster algorithm to measure axial length
    Hill, Warren
    Angeles, Raymund
    Otani, Todd
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 34 (06) : 920 - 924
  • [9] HITZENBERGER CK, 1991, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V32, P616
  • [10] HITZENBERGER CK, 1993, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V34, P1886