Seismic performance assessment of a hybrid coupled wall system with replaceable steel coupling beams versus traditional RC coupling beams

被引:99
作者
Ji, Xiaodong [1 ]
Liu, Dan [1 ]
Sun, Ya [2 ]
Molina Hutt, Carlos [3 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Civil Engn, China Educ Minist, Key Lab Civil Engn Safety & Durabil, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] China Architecture Design & Res Grp, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[3] UCL, Civil Environm & Geomat Engn, London WC1E 6BT, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
hybrid coupled wall (HCW); replaceable steel coupling beam (RSCB); RC coupling beam; nonlinear dynamic analysis; seismic fragility; damage assessment; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1002/eqe.2801
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study assesses the seismic performance of a hybrid coupled wall (HCW) system with replaceable steel coupling beams (RSCBs) at four intensities of ground motion shaking. The performance of the HCW system is benchmarked against the traditional reinforced concrete coupled wall (RCW). Nonlinear numerical models are developed in OpenSees for a representative wall elevation in a prototype 11-story building designed per modern Chinese codes. Performance is assessed via nonlinear dynamic analysis. The results indicate that both systems can adequately meet code defined objectives in terms of global and component behavior. Behavior of the two systems is consistent under service level earthquakes, whereas under more extreme events, the HCW system illustrates enhanced performance over the RCW system resulting in peak interstory drifts up to 31% lower in the HCW than the RCW. Larger drifts in the RCW are because of reduced coupling action induced by stiffness degradation of RC coupling beams, whereas the stable hysteretic responses and overstrength of RSCBs benefit post-yield behavior of the HCW. Under extreme events, the maximum beam rotations of the RSCBs are up to 42% smaller than those of the RC coupling beams. Moderate to severe damage is expected in the RC coupling beams, whereas the RSCBs sustain damage to the slab above the beam and possible web buckling of shear links. The assessment illustrates the benefits of the HCW with RSCBs over the RCW system, because of easy replacement of the shear links as opposed to costly and time-consuming repairs of RC coupling beams. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 535
页数:19
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, J STRUCT ENG, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:10(1282)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SEISM PROV STRUCT ST
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, THESIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, SEISMIC PERFORMANCE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 4113 ASCESEI
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14). ACI 318-14
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1988, J BUILD STRUCT
[8]  
[Anonymous], OPEN SYSTEM EARTHQUA
[9]   Viscoelastic coupling dampers (VCDs) for enhanced wind and seismic performance of high-rise buildings [J].
Christopoulos, Constantin ;
Montgomery, Michael .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2013, 42 (15) :2217-2233
[10]  
CMC, 2010, GB 50011-2010