The Effects of Individual Variables, Farming System Characteristics and Perceived Barriers on Actual Use of Smart Farming Technologies: Evidence from the Piedmont Region, Northwestern Italy

被引:46
作者
Caffaro, Federica [1 ]
Cavallo, Eugenio [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Council CNR Italy, Inst Agr & Earthmoving Machines IMAMOTER, Str Cacce 73, I-10135 Turin, Italy
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2019年 / 9卷 / 05期
关键词
barrier to innovation; farmers' perception; innovation adoption; Smart Farming; Italy; AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGIES; ADOPTION; KNOWLEDGE; MODEL; INNOVATIONS; IRRIGATION; DIFFUSION; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture9050111
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Smart Farming Technologies (SFTs) have a real potential to deliver more productive and sustainable agricultural production. However, limited empirical research is available on the role played by objective and subjective factors in the adoption of such disruptive innovations, especially in the Italian context. This study investigated the role of education, farm size, being a sole farmer, and perceived barriers in affecting the use of SFTs in a sample of Italian farmers from the Piedmont region (North-West Italy). Three hundred and ten farming operators were questioned via a paper-and-pencil questionnaire. The analyses showed that low levels of education and working on-farm alone were positively associated with perceived economic barriers, which in turn were negatively associated with the adoption of SFTs. Farm size had a positive direct effect on SFT adoption. The results pointed out the need for targeted policies and training interventions to encourage the use of SFTs.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] Producers' perceptions and attitudes toward precision agriculture technologies
    Adrian, AM
    Norwood, SH
    Mask, PL
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2005, 48 (03) : 256 - 271
  • [2] A different paradigm for the initial colonisation of Sahul
    Allen, Jim
    O'Connell, James F.
    [J]. ARCHAEOLOGY IN OCEANIA, 2020, 55 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [3] Alliance for Internet of Things Innovation, 2015, SMART FARM FOOD SAF
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, Disruptive Technologies: Advances That Will Transforms Life
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, DAT WAR
  • [6] Arbuckle J.L., 2014, AMOS TM 23 USERS GUI
  • [7] BENTLER PM, 1980, PSYCHOL BULL, V88, P588, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  • [8] Food for Hope: The Role of Personal Resources in Farmers' Adoption of Green Technology
    Bukchin, Shira
    Kerret, Dorit
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (05)
  • [9] CONSENT AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN DIVERSE RESEARCH CONTEXTS: REVIEWING AND DEVELOPING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
    Bull, Susan
    Cheah, Phaik Yeong
    Lwin, Khin Maung
    Marsh, Vicki
    Molyneux, Sassy
    Parker, Michael
    Theobald, Sally
    Bandewar, Sunita
    Calazans, Gabriela
    Chipasula, Tamara
    Chheng, Kheng
    Davies, Alun
    Dunn, Michael
    Faiz, M. A.
    Imrie, John
    Kamuya, Dorcas
    Kerasidou, Angeliki
    Lavery, James V.
    Lindegger, Graham
    MacPherson, Eleanor
    Muga, Charles T.
    Nakibinge, Stephen
    Ndebele, Paul
    Sadalaki, John
    Seeley, Janet
    Sheehan, Mark
    Twine, Rhian
    de Vries, Jantina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2013, 8 (04) : 1 - 18
  • [10] An ergonomic approach to sustainable development: The role of information environment and social-psychological variables in the adoption of agri-environmental innovations
    Caffaro, Federica
    Roccato, Michele
    Cremasco, Margherita Micheletti
    Cavallo, Eugenio
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 27 (06) : 1049 - 1062