Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach

被引:170
作者
Campitelli, Guillermo [1 ]
Gerrans, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Psychol & Social Sci, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, UWA Business Sch, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
Cognitive reflection test; Actively open-minded thinking; Rational thinking; Thinking dispositions; Mathematical ability; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; DECISION-MAKING; BELIEF-BIAS; THINKING; NUMERACY; PERFORMANCE; HEURISTICS; ABILITY;
D O I
10.3758/s13421-013-0367-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We used a mathematical modeling approach, based on a sample of 2,019 participants, to better understand what the cognitive reflection test (CRT; Frederick In Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25-42, 2005) measures. This test, which is typically completed in less than 10 min, contains three problems and aims to measure the ability or disposition to resist reporting the response that first comes to mind. However, since the test contains three mathematically based problems, it is possible that the test only measures mathematical abilities, and not cognitive reflection. We found that the models that included an inhibition parameter (i.e., the probability of inhibiting an intuitive response), as well as a mathematical parameter (i.e., the probability of using an adequate mathematical procedure), fitted the data better than a model that only included a mathematical parameter. We also found that the inhibition parameter in males is best explained by both rational thinking ability and the disposition toward actively open-minded thinking, whereas in females this parameter was better explained by rational thinking only. With these findings, this study contributes to the understanding of the processes involved in solving the CRT, and will be particularly useful for researchers who are considering using this test in their research.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 447
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Cognitive Philosophy of Reflection
    Stephens, Andreas
    Tjostheim, Trond A.
    ERKENNTNIS, 2022, 87 (05) : 2219 - 2242
  • [32] The development of cognitive reflection
    Shtulman, Andrew
    Young, Andrew G.
    CHILD DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2023, 17 (01) : 59 - 66
  • [33] The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks
    Maggie E. Toplak
    Richard F. West
    Keith E. Stanovich
    Memory & Cognition, 2011, 39
  • [34] Does the Cognitive Reflection Test Work with Chinese College Students? Evidence from a Time-Limited Study
    Li, Zhaoxian
    Yan, Shangsong
    Liu, Jie
    Bao, Wei
    Luo, Junlong
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2024, 14 (04)
  • [35] Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making
    Sinayev, Aleksandr
    Peters, Ellen
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
  • [36] An Alternative Correct Answer to the Cognitive Reflection Test
    Filkukova, Petra
    Langguth, Johannes
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [37] The time course of conflict on the Cognitive Reflection Test
    Travers, Eoin
    Rolison, Jonathan J.
    Feeney, Aidan
    COGNITION, 2016, 150 : 109 - 118
  • [38] The cognitive reflection test is robust to multiple exposures
    Bialek, Michal
    Pennycook, Gordon
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2018, 50 (05) : 1953 - 1959
  • [39] Cognitive reflection test and behavioral biases in Malaysia
    Albaity, Mohamed
    Rahman, Mahfuzur
    Shahidul, Islam
    JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2014, 9 (02): : 148 - 151
  • [40] Does performance on the cognitive reflection test indicate cognitive miserliness? Evidence from response times, working memory capacity, and warnings
    Rachev, Nikolay R.
    Peycheva, Ekaterina
    Kamburidis, Julia
    McElroy, Todd
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2025,