Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach

被引:170
|
作者
Campitelli, Guillermo [1 ]
Gerrans, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Psychol & Social Sci, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, UWA Business Sch, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
Cognitive reflection test; Actively open-minded thinking; Rational thinking; Thinking dispositions; Mathematical ability; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; DECISION-MAKING; BELIEF-BIAS; THINKING; NUMERACY; PERFORMANCE; HEURISTICS; ABILITY;
D O I
10.3758/s13421-013-0367-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We used a mathematical modeling approach, based on a sample of 2,019 participants, to better understand what the cognitive reflection test (CRT; Frederick In Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25-42, 2005) measures. This test, which is typically completed in less than 10 min, contains three problems and aims to measure the ability or disposition to resist reporting the response that first comes to mind. However, since the test contains three mathematically based problems, it is possible that the test only measures mathematical abilities, and not cognitive reflection. We found that the models that included an inhibition parameter (i.e., the probability of inhibiting an intuitive response), as well as a mathematical parameter (i.e., the probability of using an adequate mathematical procedure), fitted the data better than a model that only included a mathematical parameter. We also found that the inhibition parameter in males is best explained by both rational thinking ability and the disposition toward actively open-minded thinking, whereas in females this parameter was better explained by rational thinking only. With these findings, this study contributes to the understanding of the processes involved in solving the CRT, and will be particularly useful for researchers who are considering using this test in their research.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 447
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] COGNITIVE REFLECTION AND SOCIALLY BIASED DECISIONS
    Baldi, Pier Luigi
    Iannello, Paola
    Riva, Silvia
    Antonietti, Alessandro
    STUDIA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2013, 55 (04) : 265 - 271
  • [22] Explaining sex differences on the Cognitive Reflection Test
    Zhang, Don C.
    Highhouse, Scott
    Rada, Thaddeus B.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2016, 101 : 425 - 427
  • [23] Does cognitive reflection predict attentional control in visual tasks?
    Dorigoni, Alessia
    Rajsic, Jason
    Bonini, Nicolao
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2022, 226
  • [24] Evaluating the Cognitive Reflection Test as a Measure of Intuition/Reflection, Numeracy, and Insight Problem Solving, and the Implications for Understanding Real-World Judgments and Beliefs
    Patel, Niraj
    Baker, S. Glenn
    Scherer, Laura D.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2019, 148 (12) : 2129 - 2153
  • [25] Cognitive Reflection Test in Predicting Rational Behavior in the Dictator Game
    Czerwonka, Monika
    Staniszewska, Aleksandra
    Kompa, Krzysztof
    PROBLEMS, METHODS AND TOOLS IN EXPERIMENTAL AND BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS, 2018, : 301 - 312
  • [26] Faith in intuition and cognitive reflection
    Alos-Ferrer, Carlos
    Huegelschaefer, Sabine
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 64 : 61 - 70
  • [27] Sex differences on cognitive reflection
    Olalde, Blanca Rosa
    Palacios, Santiago
    ANALES DE PSICOLOGIA, 2023, 39 (02): : 314 - 320
  • [28] A limitation of the Cognitive Reflection Test: familiarity
    Stieger, Stefan
    Reips, Ulf-Dietrich
    PEERJ, 2016, 4
  • [29] Decision making under risk: prospect theory approach and cognitive reflection test
    da Silva, Patrick Diliane Cardoso
    Mendonca, Jorge Manuel Pires
    Gomes, Luis Miguel Pereira
    Silva, Maria de Lurdes Vasconcelos Babo e
    REVISTA DE GESTAO E SECRETARIADO-GESEC, 2023, 14 (07): : 11891 - 11916
  • [30] Performance on the Cognitive Reflection Test is stable across time
    Stagnaro, Michael N.
    Pennycook, Gordon
    Rand, David G.
    JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2018, 13 (03): : 260 - 267