Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach

被引:170
|
作者
Campitelli, Guillermo [1 ]
Gerrans, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Psychol & Social Sci, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, UWA Business Sch, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
Cognitive reflection test; Actively open-minded thinking; Rational thinking; Thinking dispositions; Mathematical ability; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; DECISION-MAKING; BELIEF-BIAS; THINKING; NUMERACY; PERFORMANCE; HEURISTICS; ABILITY;
D O I
10.3758/s13421-013-0367-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We used a mathematical modeling approach, based on a sample of 2,019 participants, to better understand what the cognitive reflection test (CRT; Frederick In Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25-42, 2005) measures. This test, which is typically completed in less than 10 min, contains three problems and aims to measure the ability or disposition to resist reporting the response that first comes to mind. However, since the test contains three mathematically based problems, it is possible that the test only measures mathematical abilities, and not cognitive reflection. We found that the models that included an inhibition parameter (i.e., the probability of inhibiting an intuitive response), as well as a mathematical parameter (i.e., the probability of using an adequate mathematical procedure), fitted the data better than a model that only included a mathematical parameter. We also found that the inhibition parameter in males is best explained by both rational thinking ability and the disposition toward actively open-minded thinking, whereas in females this parameter was better explained by rational thinking only. With these findings, this study contributes to the understanding of the processes involved in solving the CRT, and will be particularly useful for researchers who are considering using this test in their research.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 447
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach
    Guillermo Campitelli
    Paul Gerrans
    Memory & Cognition, 2014, 42 : 434 - 447
  • [2] Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition?
    Pennycook, Gordon
    Cheyne, James Allan
    Koehler, Derek J.
    Fugelsang, Jonathan A.
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2016, 48 (01) : 341 - 348
  • [3] Measuring cognitive reflection without maths: Development and validation of the verbal cognitive reflection test
    Sirota, Miroslav
    Dewberry, Chris
    Juanchich, Marie
    Valus, Lenka
    Marshall, Amanda C.
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 34 (03) : 322 - 343
  • [4] Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition?
    Gordon Pennycook
    James Allan Cheyne
    Derek J. Koehler
    Jonathan A. Fugelsang
    Behavior Research Methods, 2016, 48 : 341 - 348
  • [5] A reflection on cognitive reflection - testing convergent/divergent validity of two measures of cognitive reflection
    Erceg, Nikola
    Galic, Zvonimir
    Ruzojcic, Mitja
    JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2020, 15 (05): : 741 - 755
  • [6] Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test
    Toplak, Maggie E.
    West, Richard F.
    Stanovich, Keith E.
    THINKING & REASONING, 2014, 20 (02) : 147 - 168
  • [7] One test, five scoring procedures: different ways of approaching the cognitive reflection test
    Erceg, Nikola
    Bubic, Andreja
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 29 (03) : 381 - 392
  • [8] The cognitive reflection test revisited: exploring the ways individuals solve the test
    Szaszi, B.
    Szollosi, A.
    Palfi, B.
    Aczel, B.
    THINKING & REASONING, 2017, 23 (03) : 207 - 234
  • [9] Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test
    Thomson, Keela S.
    Oppenheimer, Daniel M.
    JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2016, 11 (01): : 99 - 113
  • [10] Why does the Cognitive Reflection Test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things)?
    Baron, Jonathan
    Scott, Sydney
    Fincher, Katrina
    Metz, S. Emlen
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2015, 4 (03) : 265 - 284