Cost Comparative Analysis of a New Green Building Code for Residential Project Development

被引:39
作者
Kim, Jin-Lee [1 ,2 ]
Greene, Martin [1 ]
Kim, Sunkuk [2 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Long Beach, Dept Civil Engn & Construct Engn Management, Long Beach, CA 90630 USA
[2] Kyung Hee Univ, Dept Architectural Engn, Yongin 446701, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Green buildings; Project management; Residential buildings; Construction costs; Comparative studies; Energy; Project planning and design; CONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000833
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper presents a comprehensive cost comparative analysis for the impact of the new Green Building Code on residential project development from project management perspectives. As the demand for new residential housing is gradually increasing from the long recession, residential project management is vital for project owners making decisions concerning the investment of new green building features, such as energy-efficient appliances, equipment, and lighting. The analysis results show that the incorporation of such green systems causes the construction costs to increase by 10.77% more than the traditional building, whereas the amount of working days only increases by two days. The findings can be used as a guide for project owners to make decisions concerning their monetary initial investments while benefiting from energy cost savings over the life cycle of the building.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   A Comparative Performance Analysis of Different Insulation Materials Installed in a Residential Building of a Cold Region in Pakistan [J].
Iqbal, Amna ;
Mubin, Sajjad ;
Gavrishyk, Ekaterina ;
Masood, Rehan ;
Roy, Krishanu ;
Moradibistouni, Milad .
JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES SCIENCE, 2022, 6 (06)
[22]   Impact of carbon tax on green building development: An evolutionary game analysis [J].
Zhao, Yu ;
Gao, Gege ;
Zhang, Jixiang ;
Yu, Miao .
ENERGY POLICY, 2024, 195
[23]   Social Network Analysis of Factors Influencing Green Building Development in China [J].
Huang, Ning ;
Bai, Libiao ;
Wang, Hailing ;
Du, Qiang ;
Shao, Long ;
Li, Jingtao .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (12)
[24]   Economic feasibility of green office building: Combining life cycle cost analysis and cost-benefit evaluation [J].
Miraj, Perdana ;
Berawi, Mohammed Ali ;
Utami, Siti Rahma .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE, 2022, 37 (01) :202-202
[25]   Economic feasibility of green office building: combining life cycle cost analysis and cost-benefit evaluation [J].
Miraj, Perdana ;
Berawi, Mohammed Ali ;
Utami, Siti Rahma .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2021, 49 (06) :624-638
[26]   Benchmarking green building attributes to achieve cost effectiveness using a data envelopment analysis [J].
Vyas, G. S. ;
Jha, K. N. .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2017, 28 :127-134
[27]   Life cycle cost analysis of a multi-storey residential Net Zero Energy Building in Denmark [J].
Marszal, Anna Joanna ;
Heiselberg, Per .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (09) :5600-5609
[28]   Estimating Production and Warranty Cost at the Early Stage of a New Product Development Project [J].
Relich, Marcin ;
Nielsen, Izabela .
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2021, 54 (01) :1092-1097
[29]   Green building rating systems comparative study and development methodology from global and local prospective [J].
Mohammed, Yousif ;
Hayder, Gasim ;
Thiruchelvam, Sivadass .
ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 27 (03) :5479-5524
[30]   The Evaluation of Green Building's Feasibility: Comparative Analysis across Different Geological Conditions [J].
Mckenna, Jessica ;
Harris, Sophia ;
Heinrich, Kris ;
Stewart, Taylor ;
Gharehbaghi, Koorosh .
ENG, 2023, 4 (03) :2034-2054