Exploring the impact of atmospheric forcing and basal drag on the Antarctic Ice Sheet under Last Glacial Maximum conditions

被引:6
作者
Blasco, Javier [1 ,2 ]
Alvarez-Solas, Jorge [1 ,2 ]
Robinson, Alexander [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Montoya, Marisa [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Ciencias Fis, Dept Fis Tierra & Astrofis, Madrid 28040, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, Inst Geociencias, CSIC, Madrid 28040, Spain
[3] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
SURFACE MASS-BALANCE; SEA-LEVEL CHANGE; ISOSTATIC-ADJUSTMENT MODEL; LARGE ENSEMBLE ANALYSIS; BRIEF COMMUNICATION; PISM-PIK; SHELF; CLIMATE; GREENLAND; PARAMETERIZATION;
D O I
10.5194/tc-15-215-2021
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Little is known about the distribution of ice in the Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). Whereas marine and terrestrial geological data indicate that the grounded ice advanced to a position close to the continental-shelf break, the total ice volume is unclear. Glacial boundary conditions are potentially important sources of uncertainty, in particular basal friction and climatic boundary conditions. Basal friction exerts a strong control on the large-scale dynamics of the ice sheet and thus affects its size and is not well constrained. Glacial climatic boundary conditions determine the net accumulation and ice temperature and are also poorly known. Here we explore the effect of the uncertainty in both features on the total simulated ice storage of the AIS at the LGM. For this purpose we use a hybrid ice sheet shelf model that is forced with different basal drag choices and glacial background climatic conditions obtained from the LGM ensemble climate simulations of the third phase of the Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP3). Overall, we find that the spread in the simulated ice volume for the tested basal drag parameterizations is about the same range as for the different general circulation model (GCM) forcings (4 to 6 m sea level equivalent). For a wide range of plausible basal friction configurations, the simulated ice dynamics vary widely but all simulations produce fully extended ice sheets towards the continental-shelf break. More dynamically active ice sheets correspond to lower ice volumes, while they remain consistent with the available constraints on ice extent. Thus, this work points to the possibility of an AIS with very active ice streams during the LGM. In addition, we find that the surface boundary temperature field plays a crucial role in determining the ice extent through its effect on viscosity. For ice sheets of a similar extent and comparable dynamics, we find that the precipitation field determines the total AIS volume. However, precipitation is highly uncertain. Climatic fields simulated by climate models show more precipitation in coastal regions than a spatially uniform anomaly, which can lead to larger ice volumes. Our results strongly support using these paleoclimatic fields to simulate and study the LGM and potentially other time periods like the last interglacial. However, their accuracy must be assessed as well, as differences between climate model forcing lead to a large spread in the simulated ice volume and extension.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 231
页数:17
相关论文
共 102 条
  • [1] Ice-sheet configuration in the CMIP5/PMIP3 Last Glacial Maximum experiments
    Abe-Ouchi, A.
    Saito, F.
    Kageyama, M.
    Braconnot, P.
    Harrison, S. P.
    Lambeck, K.
    Otto-Bliesner, B. L.
    Peltier, W. R.
    Tarasov, L.
    Peterschmitt, J. -Y.
    Takahashi, K.
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 8 (11) : 3621 - 3637
  • [2] Glacial-cycle simulations of the Antarctic Ice Sheet with the Parallel Ice Sheet Model (PISM) - Part 1: Boundary conditions and climatic forcing
    Albrecht, Torsten
    Winkelmann, Ricarda
    Levermann, Anders
    [J]. CRYOSPHERE, 2020, 14 (02) : 599 - 632
  • [3] Ocean-driven millennial-scale variability of the Eurasian ice sheet during the last glacial period simulated with a hybrid ice-sheet-shelf model
    Alvarez-Solas, Jorge
    Banderas, Ruben
    Robinson, Alexander
    Montoya, Marisa
    [J]. CLIMATE OF THE PAST, 2019, 15 (03) : 957 - 979
  • [4] The Antarctic Ice Sheet during the Last Glacial Maximum and its subsequent retreat history: a review
    Anderson, JB
    Shipp, SS
    Lowe, AL
    Wellner, JS
    Mosola, AB
    [J]. QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2002, 21 (1-3) : 49 - 70
  • [5] Ross Sea paleo-ice sheet drainage and deglacial history during and since the LGM
    Anderson, John B.
    Conway, Howard
    Bart, Philip J.
    Witus, Alexandra E.
    Greenwood, Sarah L.
    McKay, Robert M.
    Hall, Brenda L.
    Ackert, Robert P.
    Licht, Kathy
    Jakobsson, Martin
    Stone, John O.
    [J]. QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2014, 100 : 31 - 54
  • [6] The Antarctica component of postglacial rebound model ICE-6G_C (VM5a) based on GPS positioning, exposure age dating of ice thicknesses, and relative sea level histories
    Argus, Donald F.
    Peltier, W. R.
    Drummond, R.
    Moore, Angelyn W.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 198 (01) : 537 - 563
  • [7] Modelling Antarctic sea-level data to explore the possibility of a dominant Antarctic contribution to meltwater pulse IA
    Bassett, S. E.
    Milne, G. A.
    Bentley, M. J.
    Huybrechts, P.
    [J]. QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2007, 26 (17-18) : 2113 - 2127
  • [8] Bentley M.J., 2014, Quat. Sci. Rev, V100, P1, DOI [10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.06.025, DOI 10.1016/J.QUASCIREV.2014.06.025]
  • [9] Blasco J., 2020, LGM AIS PMIP3 REPOSI, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.4139169, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.4139169]
  • [10] The Antarctic Ice Sheet response to glacial millennial-scale variability
    Blasco, Javier
    Tabone, Ilaria
    Alvarez-Solas, Jorge
    Robinson, Alexander
    Montoya, Marisa
    [J]. CLIMATE OF THE PAST, 2019, 15 (01) : 121 - 133