Spatial variability of soil quality indicators in New Zealand soils and land uses

被引:6
|
作者
Giltrap, DJ [1 ]
Hewitt, AE [1 ]
机构
[1] Landcare Res, Lincoln 8152, New Zealand
关键词
soil quality indicators; soil spatial variability; land use effects; sampling design;
D O I
10.1080/00288233.2004.9513584
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Spatial variability of soil quality indicators was estimated in two studies to help plan sampling strategies. In the first study, spatial dependence of six soil quality indicators was measured for one soil order and one land use. Variation was measured between samples at 5 -, 30-, and 100-m spacings, and between fields in Allophanic soils under pasture, to estimate the effect of sample spacing on the spatial variability of pH, total volumetric C and total volumetric N, C:N ratio, Olsen P, and mineralisable N. The second study tested the effects of land use and soil type on variation between samples at spacings less than 29 m at 65 sites. This second study also included base saturation, cation exchange capacity, bulk density, total porosity, and macroporosity in addition to the indicators of the first study. All samples were taken from the soil surface to 10 cm depth. Results of the first study in Allophanic soils suggested sample replication spacings of 5 m or more for pH, 30 m or more for Olsen P, and mineralisable N, and 100 m or more for total C,. total N, and C:N ratio. Sampling at less than these intervals will display some degree of autocorrelation and will less efficiently represent variation in the management unit being sampled. Results of the second indicated no significant effect of soil order on coefficient of variation, but land use did have an effect, with cropping having the lowest coefficient of variation followed by pasture, exotic forest, and native forest.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 177
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Spatial Variability of Soil Organic Matter and Cation Exchange Capacity in an Oxisol under Different Land Uses
    Paz Ferreiro, Jorge
    De Almeida, Vicente Pereira
    Alves, Marlene Cristina
    De Abreu, Cleide Aparecida
    Vieira, Sidney R.
    Vidal Vazquez, Eva
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2016, 47 : 75 - 89
  • [22] Assessment of soil quality indicators under different agricultural land uses and topographic aspects in Central Vietnam
    Tung Gia Pham
    Hung Trong Nguyen
    Kappas, Martin
    INTERNATIONAL SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION RESEARCH, 2018, 6 (04) : 280 - 288
  • [23] Geostatistical Assessment of Spatial Variability of Soil Organic Carbon Under Different Land Uses of Northwestern India
    Bhabani Prasad Mondal
    Bharpoor Singh Sekhon
    R. K. Setia
    Rahul Sadhukhan
    Agricultural Research, 2021, 10 : 407 - 416
  • [24] Effects of Land Uses on Soil Quality Indicators: The Case of Geshy Subcatchment, Gojeb River Catchment, Ethiopia
    Dagnachew, Melku
    Moges, Awdenegest
    Kassa, Asfaw Kebede
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL SOIL SCIENCE, 2019, 2019
  • [25] Visual examinations and soil physical and hydraulic properties for assessing soil structural quality of soils with contrasting textures and land uses
    Pulido Moncada, Mansonia
    Penning, Letiane Helwig
    Timm, Luis Carlos
    Gabriels, Donald
    Cornelis, Wim M.
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2014, 140 : 20 - 28
  • [26] A soil sampling protocol to minimise the spatial variability in soil test values in New Zealand hill country
    Morton, JD
    Baird, DB
    Manning, MJ
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2000, 43 (03) : 367 - 375
  • [27] Performance of soil condition indicators across taxonomic groups and land uses
    Schipper, LA
    Sparling, GP
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2000, 64 (01) : 300 - 311
  • [28] Soil sampling based on field spatial variability of soil microbial indicators
    Peigne, Josephine
    Vian, Jean-Francois
    Cannavacciuolo, Mario
    Bottollier, B.
    Chaussod, Remi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL BIOLOGY, 2009, 45 (5-6) : 488 - 495
  • [29] Topsoil characteristics of three contrasting New Zealand soils under four long-term land uses
    Sparling, GP
    Shepherd, TG
    Schipper, LA
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2000, 43 (04) : 569 - 583
  • [30] Do soil horizons and land-uses screen different sets of soil quality indicators in the hilly region of northeast India?
    Roy, Partha Deb
    Jena, Roomesh Kumar
    Mitran, Tarik
    Moharana, Pravash Chandra
    Basak, Nirmalendu
    Saha, Bholanath
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2024, 83 (17)