共 64 条
Peri-implant marginal bone loss rate pre- and post-loading: An exploratory analysis of associated factors
被引:16
作者:
Acharya, Aneesha
[1
,2
]
Leung, Ming Chi Terrence
[1
]
Ng, King Tung
[1
]
Fan, Michael H. M.
[1
]
Fokas, George
[1
]
Mattheos, Nikos
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Dent, Implant Dent, Prosthodont, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Dr DY Patil Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Periodontol, Pune, Maharashtra, India
关键词:
bone implant interactions;
clinical assessment;
clinical research;
clinical trials;
diagnosis;
RETAINED MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURE;
DENTAL IMPLANTS;
CRESTAL BONE;
FOLLOW-UP;
RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION;
DEHISCENCE DEFECTS;
ANTERIOR MAXILLA;
LEVEL IMPLANTS;
REGENERATION;
PLACEMENT;
D O I:
10.1111/clr.13424
中图分类号:
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号:
1003 ;
摘要:
Objectives To perform an exploratory analysis of factors influencing annual rates of peri-implant marginal bone loss (RBL) calculated over different time frames, at implants unaffected by peri-implantitis. Material and methods A total of 154 implants from 86 patients were reviewed at 1.6-6.8 years after placement. Marginal bone levels (MBL) were assessed on intraoral radiographs at three time-points: immediately post-placement, time of loading, and least 1-year post-loading. RBLs (mm/year) were computed using these three time frames and corresponding MBL changes as: RBL placement-loading, RBL loading-review, RBL placement-review. Exploratory ordination of three RBLs, corresponding time durations, and 17 background factors were used for visualization. Hierarchical linear mixed-effects models (MEM) with predictor selection were applied to RBL outcomes. The correlation of actual MBL with MBLs predicted by RBL placement-loading and RBL loading-review was tested. Results Median RBL placement-loading was 0.9 mm/year (IQR = 2.02), loading-review was 0.06 mm/year (IQR = 0.16), and overall RBL placement-review was 0.21 mm/year (IQR = 0.33). Among-patient variance was highest for RBL placement-loading (SD = 0.66). Longer time predicted lower RBL in all time frames. Shorter time of loading significantly predicted lower RBL placement-review. Augmentation predicted lower RBL placement-loading, while anterior location and older age predicted lower RBLs placement-loading placement-review. Only MBL projected using RBL placement-loading significantly correlated with actual MBL. Conclusions Exploratory analysis indicated RBL varied with the time duration used for calculation in pre- and post-loading, and overall periods. In each period, RBL declined with increasing time. Earlier loading predicted lower overall RBL. Higher pre-loading RBL predicted worse actual bone level.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 419
页数:10
相关论文