Wind tunnel and field calibration of six aeolian dust samplers

被引:158
作者
Goossens, D
Offer, ZY
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Lab Expt Geomorphol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Wageningen Univ Agr, Eros & Soil & Water Conservat Grp, NL-6709 PA Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Jacob Blaustein Inst Desert Res, Desert Meteorol Unit, Ctr Environm Phys, IL-84990 Sede Boqer, Israel
关键词
wind; aeolian dust; calibration; dust flux gauge; dust deposit gauge;
D O I
10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00376-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The efficiency of six aeolian dust samplers was tested via wind tunnel experiments and field measurements. In the wind tunnel, four samplers designed to measure the horizontal dust flux and one sampler designed to measure the vertical dust fur tin the downward direction, i.e., deposition) were calibrated against an isokinetic reference sampler. The horizontal dust flux samplers were: the big spring number eight sampler (BSNE), the modified Wilson and Cooke sampler (MWAC), the suspended sediment trap (SUSTRA), and the wedge dust flux gauge (WDFG). Vertical deposition flux was measured using a marble dust collector (MDCO). A modified Sartorius SM 16711 dust sampler with adjustable flow rate (SARTORIUS) was used as isokinetic reference sampler. In the field experiments, the WDFG was replaced by a Sierra ultra high volume dust sampler (SIERRA). Wind tunnel calibrations were carried out at five wind velocities ranging from 1 to 5 m s(-1). Field calibrations were conducted during seven periods of two weeks each. The most efficient samplers are the MWAC and the SIERRA, followed by the BSNE and the SUSTRA. The WDFG is more effective than the BSNE at velocities below 3 m s(-1), but its efficiency drops quickly at higher wind speeds. The most recommendable sampler for field measurements is the BSNE, because its efficiency varies only very slightly with wind speed. In the absence of horizontal flux samplers, the MDCO collector can be used as an alternative to assess horizontal dust flux and airborne dust concentration provided the appropriate calibrations are made. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1043 / 1057
页数:15
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Bakkum A. W. G., 1994, BEHAV ARTIFICIAL SOI, P40
  • [2] BELYAEV SP, 1972, AEROSOL SCIENCE, V3, P127
  • [3] BUCHER A, 1986, THESIS U REIMS CHAMP, P290
  • [4] CLEMENTS T, 1963, ES8 US ARM NAT LAB M
  • [5] DEPOSITION OF PARTICLES ON MOSS AND GRASS SURFACES
    CLOUGH, WS
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1975, 9 (12) : 1113 - 1119
  • [6] Drew R.T., 1978, Air sampling instruments for evaluation of atmospheric contaminants, V5th edn, P1
  • [7] FRYREAR DW, 1986, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V41, P117
  • [8] FURTADO VC, 1978, AIR SAMPLING INSTRUM, pK3
  • [9] GANOR E, 1975, THESIS HEBREW U JERS
  • [10] GOODMAN GT, 1979, SAHARAN DUST MOBILIZ, P211