Viscosity measurements of (CH4 + C3H8 + CO2) mixtures at temperatures between (203 and 420) K and pressures between (3 and 31) MPa

被引:15
作者
Al Ghafri, Saif Z. S. [1 ]
Czubinski, Fernando F. [2 ]
May, Eric F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Mech & Chem Engn, Fluid Sci & Resources Div, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Dept Mech Engn, POLO Res Labs Emerging Technol Cooling & Thermoph, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
关键词
Viscosity; Modelling; Carbon dioxide; Methane; Propane; Natural gas; NATURAL-GAS MIXTURES; METHANE-CARBON DIOXIDE; HARD-SPHERE MODEL; MULTIPARAMETER CORRELATION; RESERVOIR SIMULATIONS; TRANSPORT-PROPERTIES; DYNAMIC VISCOSITY; BINARY-MIXTURES; FLUID MIXTURES; DENSE FLUIDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.087
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In this work, viscosity measurements of the ternary mixture [0.6511CH(4) + 0.0808C(3)H(8) + 0.2681CO(2)] were made over the temperature range (203-420) K and at pressures up to 31 MPa, with a combined overall standard uncertainty of 2.5%. The presence of CO2 or propane in the ternary mixture was found to always increase the viscosity relative to the constituent binary mixtures with larger differences observed at the highest density conditions: adding 26.8% mole fraction of CO2 to the binary mixture [xCH(4) + (1-x)C3H8] with x = 0.8888, increased the viscosity by up to 45%. Similarly, adding 8.1% mole fraction of propane to the binary mixture [xCH(4) + (1-x)CO2] with x = 0.7084, increased the viscosity by up to 23%; in this case, while the effect was apparent at lower temperatures, it was negligible at 370 K and above. The ternary mixture data were compared with the predictions of five models: corresponding states based approaches (ECS, SuperTRAPP and PFCT), the LBC model used widely by petroleum engineers, and a model (LJ) based on molecular dynamics simulations of Lennard Jones fluids. The relative deviations of the measured viscosities from those calculated by the five models exhibited a similar, systematic dependence on density, with stronger and larger systematic relative deviations observed at the lowest temperatures. The average absolute deviations from the measured viscosities were 2.5%, 6.4%, 8.0%, 4.2% and 3.9% for the ECS, ST, PFCT, LBC and LJ models respectively, with the ECS model providing a better representation of the data over the entire range. The present study reveals how well various engineering models can describe the viscosity of a multi-component mixture under supercritical conditions, which are of increasing interest in the energy industrial sector.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 196
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[21]   DEVELOPMENT OF A HIGH-PRESSURE CAPILLARY-TUBE VISCOMETER AND ITS APPLICATION TO METHANE PROPANE AND THEIR MIXTURES IN GASEOUS AND LIQUID REGIONS [J].
GIDDINGS, JG ;
KAO, JTF ;
KOBAYASHI, R .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1966, 45 (02) :578-+
[22]   VISCOSITIES AND DENSITIES OF METHANE-PROPANE MIXTURES AT LOW TEMPERATURES AND HIGH PRESSURES [J].
HUANG, ETS ;
SWIFT, GW ;
KURATA, F .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1967, 13 (05) :846-&
[23]  
Huber M L, 1996, Transport Properties of Fluids, P283
[25]   THE VISCOSITY OF PURE SUBSTANCES IN THE DENSE GASEOUS AND LIQUID PHASES [J].
JOSSI, JA ;
STIEL, LI ;
THODOS, G .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1962, 8 (01) :59-63
[26]   VISCOSITY AND DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT OF 6 BINARY MIXTURES [J].
KESTIN, J ;
YATA, J .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1968, 49 (11) :4780-&
[27]  
KESTIN J, 1974, BER BUNSEN PHYS CHEM, V78, P20
[28]   The GERG-2008 Wide-Range Equation of State for Natural Gases and Other Mixtures: An Expansion of GERG-2004 [J].
Kunz, O. ;
Wagner, W. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING DATA, 2012, 57 (11) :3032-3091
[29]   Dynamic viscosity measurements of three natural gas mixtures-comparison against prediction models [J].
Langelandsvik, L. I. ;
Solvang, S. ;
Rousselet, M. ;
Metaxa, I. N. ;
Assael, M. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMOPHYSICS, 2007, 28 (04) :1120-1130
[30]  
Lee AL, VISCOSITY NATURAL GA