The effects of a physical exercise programme after radical cystectomy for urinary bladder cancer. A pilot randomized controlled trial

被引:41
作者
Porserud, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Sherif, Amir [3 ]
Tollback, Anna [2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Physiotherapy, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc NVS, Div Physiotherapy, Huddinge, Sweden
[3] Umea Univ, Dept Surg & Perioperat Sci Urol & Androl, Umea, Sweden
关键词
radical cystectomy; Urinary bladder cancer; exercise; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CLINICAL-TRIALS; GUIDELINES; POPULATION; SURVIVORS; ONCOLOGY;
D O I
10.1177/0269215513506230
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: Assessment of feasibility and effects of an exercise training programme in patients following cystectomy due to urinary bladder cancer. Design: Single-blind, pilot, randomized controlled trial. Setting: University hospital, Sweden. Subjects: Eighteen patients (64-78 years), of 89 suitable, cystectomized due to urinary bladder cancer, were randomized after hospital discharge to intervention or control. Interventions: The 12-week exercise programme included group exercise training twice a week and daily walks. The control group received only standardized information at discharge. Main outcome measures: Trial eligibility and compliance to inclusion were registered. Assessments of functional capacity, balance, lower body strength and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with SF-36. Results: Out of 122 patients 89 were eligible, but 64 did not want to participate/were not invited. Twenty-five patients were included, but 7 dropped out before randomization. Eighteen patients were randomized to intervention or control. Thirteen patients completed the training period. The intervention group increased walking distance more than the control group, 109 m (75-177) compared to 62 m (36-119) (P = 0.013), and role physical domain in SF-36 more than the control group (P = 0.031). Ten patients were evaluated one year postoperatively. The intervention group had continued increasing walking distance, 20 m (19-36), whereas the control group had shortened the distance -15.5 m (-43 to -5) (P = 0.010). Conclusions: A 12-week group exercise training programme was not feasible for most cystectomy patients. However, functional capacity and the role-physical domain in HRQoL increased in the short and long term for patients in the intervention group compared with controls.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 459
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]  
[Anonymous], AM J RESP CRIT CARE
[3]  
BRICKER EM, 1950, SURG CLIN N AM, V30, P1511
[4]  
Frandin K, 1995, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V27, P231
[5]   Review of exercise intervention studies in cancer patients [J].
Galvao, DA ;
Newton, RU .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (04) :899-909
[6]   Postoperative physical training following colorectal surgery. A randomised, placebo-controlled study [J].
Houborg, K. B. ;
Jensen, M. B. ;
Rasmussen, P. ;
Gandrup, P. ;
Schroll, M. ;
Laurberg, S. .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 95 (01) :17-22
[7]  
Ingram Carolyn, 2007, Semin Oncol Nurs, V23, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.soncn.2007.08.005
[8]   A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults [J].
Jones, CJ ;
Rikli, RE ;
Beam, WC .
RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 1999, 70 (02) :113-119
[9]   Exercise Therapy in the Management of Solid Tumors [J].
Jones, Lee W. ;
Peppercorn, Jeffrey ;
Scott, Jessica M. ;
Battaglini, Claudio .
CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ONCOLOGY, 2010, 11 (1-2) :45-58
[10]   Exercise discussions during cancer treatment consultations [J].
Jones, LW ;
Courneya, KS .
CANCER PRACTICE, 2002, 10 (02) :66-74