National Institutes of Health addresses the science of diversity

被引:277
作者
Valantine, Hannah A. [1 ]
Collins, Francis S. [2 ]
机构
[1] US Natl Inst Hlth, Sci Workforce Divers, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[2] US Natl Inst Hlth, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
关键词
diversity; scientific workforce; underrepresentation in science; culture; biomedical research; ACADEMIC MEDICINE; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; GENDER; INTERVENTION; WORKFORCE; STUDENTS; FACULTY; MATTERS; THREAT; BIASES;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1515612112
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The US biomedical research workforce does not currently mirror the nation's population demographically, despite numerous attempts to increase diversity. This imbalance is limiting the promise of our biomedical enterprise for building knowledge and improving the nation's health. Beyond ensuring fairness in scientific workforce representation, recruiting and retaining a diverse set of minds and approaches is vital to harnessing the complete intellectual capital of the nation. The complexity inherent in diversifying the research workforce underscores the need for a rigorous scientific approach, consistent with the ways we address the challenges of science discovery and translation to human health. Herein, we identify four cross-cutting diversity challenges ripe for scientific exploration and opportunity: research evidence for diversity's impact on the quality and outputs of science; evidence-based approaches to recruitment and training; individual and institutional barriers to workforce diversity; and a national strategy for eliminating barriers to career transition, with scientifically based approaches for scaling and dissemination. Evidence-based data for each of these challenges should provide an integrated, stepwise approach to programs that enhance diversity rapidly within the biomedical research workforce.
引用
收藏
页码:12240 / 12242
页数:3
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], WOM MIN PERS DIS SCI
[2]   Does Stereotype Threat Affect Women in Academic Medicine? [J].
Burgess, Diana Jill ;
Joseph, Anne ;
van Ryn, Michelle ;
Carnes, Molly .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2012, 87 (04) :506-512
[3]   Gender-Heterogeneous Working Groups Produce Higher Quality Science [J].
Campbell, Lesley G. ;
Mehtani, Siya ;
Dozier, Mary E. ;
Rinehart, Janice .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (10)
[4]   The Effect of an Intervention to Break the Gender Bias Habit for Faculty at One Institution: A Cluster Randomized, Controlled Trial [J].
Carnes, Molly ;
Devine, Patricia G. ;
Manwell, Linda Baier ;
Byars-Winston, Angela ;
Fine, Eve ;
Ford, Cecilia E. ;
Forscher, Patrick ;
Isaac, Carol ;
Kaatz, Anna ;
Magua, Wairimu ;
Palta, Mari ;
Sheridan, Jennifer .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2015, 90 (02) :221-230
[5]   The case for diversity in the health care workforce [J].
Cohen, JJ ;
Gabriel, BA ;
Terrell, C .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2002, 21 (05) :90-102
[6]  
[Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy Policy and Global Affairs National Academy of Sciences National Academy of Engineering Institute of Medicine Committee on Underrepresented Groups and the Expansion of the Science and Engineering Workforce Pipeline], 2011, EXP UMP AM SCI TECHN
[7]  
Cooke Nancy J, 2015, NAS REPORT ENHANCING
[8]   Racial Diversity Matters: The Impact of Diversity-Related Student Engagement and Institutional Context [J].
Denson, Nida ;
Chang, Mitchell J. .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2009, 46 (02) :322-353
[9]  
Freeman RichardB., 2014, COLLABORATING PEOPLE
[10]   Does Diversity Pay?: Race, Gender, and the Business Case for Diversity [J].
Herring, Cedric .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2009, 74 (02) :208-224