BIOECONOMIC MODELING OF SHRIMP AQUACULTURE STRATEGIES FOR THE MAHAKAM DELTA, INDONESIA

被引:15
作者
Bunting, Stuart W. [1 ]
Bosma, Roel H. [2 ]
van Zwieten, Paul A. M. [2 ]
Sidik, A. S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essex, Sch Biol Sci, Essex Sustainabil Inst, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
[2] Wageningen Univ, Aquaculture & Fisheries Grp, NL-6700 AP Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Mulawarman Univ, Fac Fisheries & Marine Sci, Samarinda, East Kalimantan, Indonesia
关键词
Better Management Practices; bioeconomic modeling; East Kalimantan; Indonesia; integrated mangrove-shrimp culture; reconciling multiple-demands; MANGROVE FORESTRY FARMS; SOUTHERN VIETNAM; MIXED SHRIMP; ECOLOGY; LIMITATIONS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1080/13657305.2013.747226
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Bioeconomic modeling was used to evaluate traditional and extensive shrimp production in the Mahakam Delta and impacts of adopting Better Management Practices (BMP) for semi-intensive and integrated mangrove-shrimp culture. Modeling outcomes indicate that traditional production is not financially viable, failing to generate a positive 10-year Internal Rate of Return (IRR). Such practices persist in the Mahakam Delta as capital costs have been depreciated against past financial returns, input costs are negligible, risks are minimal, opportunity costs are low and options to intensify production have been retained by producers. Returns from BMP-guided semi-intensive culture (20% IRR) are marginally higher compared to extensive culture but entail a 10-fold increase in operating costs and greater risks. Integrated mangrove-shrimp production gives a reasonable IRR (53%) but costs remain high, management demanding and risks uncertain. Risk adverse operators with short-term leases may favor traditional and extensive practices. Sustainable intensification, allied to social capital development and rehabilitation of mangrove ecosystem services and environmental flows, is needed to reconcile multiple demands.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 70
页数:20
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] ADB ACIAR AwF BRR DKP FAO, 2007, PRACT MAN BETT MAN P
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, MILL EC ASS EC HUM W
  • [3] Binh CT, 1997, AQUAC RES, V28, P599, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2109.1997.00901.x
  • [4] Bondad-Reantaso M. G., 2008, 519 FAO
  • [5] Bosma R., 2007, SITUATION MANGROVE E
  • [6] Bosma R.H., 2010, GLOB AQ C 2010 19 SE
  • [7] Bunting S.W. S. W., 2013, Principles of sustainable aquaculture: promoting social, economic and environmental resilience, V1st
  • [8] Horizontally integrated aquaculture development: Exploring consensus on constraints and opportunities with a stakeholder Delphi
    Bunting, Stuart W.
    [J]. AQUACULTURE INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 16 (02) : 153 - 169
  • [9] Evaluating the economic potential of horizontally integrated land-based marine aquaculture
    Bunting, Stuart W.
    Shpigel, Muki
    [J]. AQUACULTURE, 2009, 294 (1-2) : 43 - 51
  • [10] BUNTING SW, 2001, THESIS U STIRLING ST