Dropout Rates in Randomized Clinical Trials of Antipsychotics: A Meta-analysis Comparing First- and Second-Generation Drugs and an Examination of the Role of Trial Design Features

被引:55
作者
Rabinowitz, Jonathan [1 ]
Levine, Stephen Z. [1 ]
Barkai, Orna [1 ]
Davidov, Ori [2 ]
机构
[1] Bar Ilan Univ, Ramat Gan, Israel
[2] Univ Haifa, IL-31999 Haifa, Israel
关键词
dropout; second-generation antipsychotic; first-generation antipsychotic; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; BLIND OLANZAPINE TRIAL; CHRONIC-SCHIZOPHRENIC PATIENTS; AMISULPRIDE VS. RISPERIDONE; SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER; NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS; ACUTE EXACERBATION; REFRACTORY SCHIZOPHRENIA; ATYPICAL ANTIPSYCHOTICS; 1ST-EPISODE PSYCHOSIS;
D O I
10.1093/schbul/sbn005
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Dropout is often used as an outcome measure in clinical trials of antipsychotic medication. Previous research is inconclusive regarding (a) differences in dropout rates between first- and second-generation antipsychotic medications and (b) how trial design features reduce dropout. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of antipsychotic medication was conducted to compare dropout rates for first- and second-generation antipsychotic drugs and to examine how a broad range of design features effect dropout. Ninety-three RCTs that met inclusion criteria were located (n = 26 686). Meta-analytic random effects models showed that dropout was higher for first- than second-generation drugs (odds ratio = 1.49, 95% confidence interval: 1.31-1.66). This advantage persisted after removing study arms with excessively high dosages, in flexible dose studies, studies of patients with symptom exacerbation, nonresponder patients, inpatients, and outpatients. Mixed effects models for meta-analysis were used to identify design features that effected dropout and develop formulae to derive expected dropout rates based on trial design features, and these assigned a pivotal role to duration. Collectively dropout rates are lower for second- than first-generation antipsychotic drugs and appear to be partly explained by trial design features thus providing direction for future trial design.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 788
页数:14
相关论文
共 104 条
  • [1] Efficacy and tolerability of ziprasidone versus risperidone in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: An 8-week, double-blind, multicenter trial
    Addington, DEN
    Pantelis, C
    Dineen, M
    Benattia, I
    Romano, SJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 65 (12) : 1624 - 1633
  • [2] [Anonymous], PSYCHIAT DANUBINA
  • [3] A 1-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ziprasidone 40, 80 and 160 mg/day in chronic schizophrenia: the Ziprasidone Extended Use in Schizophrenia (ZEUS) study
    Arato, M
    O'Connor, R
    Meltzer, HY
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 17 (05) : 207 - 215
  • [4] Multiple fixed doses of ''Seroquel'' (quetiapine) in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia: A comparison with haloperidol and placebo
    Arvanitis, LA
    Miller, BG
    Borison, RL
    Pitts, WM
    Sharif, ZA
    Hamner, MB
    Herz, MI
    True, JE
    Velligan, D
    Knesevich, MA
    Small, J
    Steinbook, R
    Hertzman, M
    Keck, PE
    Newcomer, JW
    Grace, J
    Rotrosen, J
    Tandon, R
    Dott, SG
    Ferguson, JM
    Addington, DEN
    MacEwan, GW
    Nair, VNP
    Shriqui, CL
    Williams, R
    Daniel, DG
    Shehi, GM
    Patterson, WM
    Merideth, CH
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 42 (04) : 233 - 246
  • [5] A double-blind comparative study of clozapine and risperidone in the management of severe chronic schizophrenia
    Azorin, JM
    Spiegel, R
    Remington, G
    Vanelle, JM
    Péré, JJ
    Giguere, M
    Bourdeix, I
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 158 (08) : 1305 - 1313
  • [6] Olanzapine versus placebo: Results of a double-blind, fixed-dose olanzapine trial
    Beasley, CM
    Sanger, T
    Satterlee, W
    Tollefson, G
    Tran, P
    Hamilton, S
    Green, A
    Dott, S
    Pfister, G
    Roxas, L
    Small, J
    Thomas, M
    Ames, D
    Schooler, N
    Baker, R
    Levine, R
    Fabre, L
    Friedel, R
    Safferman, A
    Lieberman, J
    Stahl, S
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 124 (1-2) : 159 - 167
  • [7] Olanzapine versus haloperidol: Acute phase results of the international double-blind olanzapine trial
    Beasley, CM
    Hamilton, SH
    Crawford, AM
    Dellva, MA
    Tollefson, GD
    Tran, PV
    Blin, O
    Beuzen, JN
    [J]. EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 7 (02) : 125 - 137
  • [8] Olanzapine versus placebo and haloperidol - Acute phase results of the North American double-blind olanzapine trial
    Beasley, CM
    Tollefson, G
    Tran, P
    Satterlee, W
    Sanger, T
    Hamilton, S
    Fabre, L
    Small, J
    Ereshefsky, L
    True, J
    Nemeroff, C
    Risch, SC
    Perry, PJ
    Potkin, SG
    Borison, RL
    James, S
    Meltzer, HY
    Iqbal, N
    Fann, WE
    Gewirtz, GR
    Landbloom, R
    RoyByrne, PP
    Tuason, VB
    Carman, JS
    Stokes, PE
    Williams, R
    Ancill, RJ
    MacEwan, GW
    Gujavarty, KS
    Jones, B
    Lohr, JB
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 14 (02) : 111 - 123
  • [9] A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of olanzapine in the prevention of psychotic relapse
    Beasley, CM
    Sutton, VK
    Hamilton, SH
    Walker, DJ
    Dossenbach, M
    Taylor, CC
    Alaka, KJ
    Bykowski, D
    Tollefson, GD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 23 (06) : 582 - 594
  • [10] Olanzapine versus clozapine in treatment-resistant or treatment-intolerant schizophrenia
    Bitter, I
    Dossenbach, MRK
    Brook, S
    Feldman, PD
    Metcalfe, S
    Gagiano, CA
    Füredi, J
    Bartko, G
    Janka, Z
    Banki, CM
    Kovacs, G
    Breier, A
    [J]. PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 28 (01) : 173 - 180