Cognition-mediated evolution of low-quality floral nectars

被引:25
作者
Nachev, Vladislav [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Stich, Kai Petra [2 ]
Winter, Clemens [3 ]
Bond, Alan [4 ]
Kamil, Alan [4 ]
Winter, York [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
[3] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Nebraska, Lincoln, NE USA
[5] Humboldt Univ, Inst Biol, Philippstr 13, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
关键词
FLOWERS; POLLINATION; HUMMINGBIRD; VOLUME; BEHAVIOR; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1126/science.aah4219
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Plants pollinated by hummingbirds or bats produce dilute nectars even though these animals prefer more concentrated sugar solutions. This mismatch is an unsolved evolutionary paradox. Here we show that lower quality, or more dilute, nectars evolve when the strength of preferring larger quantities or higher qualities of nectar diminishes as magnitudes of the physical stimuli increase. In a virtual evolution experiment conducted in the tropical rainforest, bats visited computer-automated flowers with simulated genomes that evolved relatively dilute nectars. Simulations replicated this evolution only when value functions, which relate the physical stimuli to subjective sensations, were nonlinear. Selection also depended on the supply/demand ratio; bats selected for more dilute nectar when competition for food was higher. We predict such a pattern to generally occur when decision-makers consider multiple value dimensions simultaneously, and increases of psychological value are not fully proportional to increases in physical magnitude.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / +
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   WHY DO HUMMINGBIRD FLOWERS SECRETE DILUTE NECTAR [J].
BOLTEN, AB ;
FEINSINGER, P .
BIOTROPICA, 1978, 10 (04) :307-309
[2]   Flower choice and learning in foraging bumblebees: Effects of variation in nectar volume and concentration [J].
Cnaani, J ;
Thomson, JD ;
Papaj, DR .
ETHOLOGY, 2006, 112 (03) :278-285
[3]   The birds, the bees, and the virtual flowers: Can pollinator Behavior drive ecological speciation in flowering plants? [J].
Gegear, Robert J. ;
Burns, James G. .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2007, 170 (04) :551-566
[4]   Risky choice and Weber's law [J].
Kacelnik, A ;
Abreu, FBE .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1998, 194 (02) :289-298
[5]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[6]   Nectar secretion requires sucrose phosphate synthases and the sugar transporter SWEET9 [J].
Lin, I. Winnie ;
Sosso, Davide ;
Chen, Li-Qing ;
Gase, Klaus ;
Kim, Sang-Gyu ;
Kessler, Danny ;
Klinkenberg, Peter M. ;
Gorder, Molly K. ;
Hou, Bi-Huei ;
Qu, Xiao-Qing ;
Carter, Clay J. ;
Baldwin, Ian T. ;
Frommer, Wolf B. .
NATURE, 2014, 508 (7497) :1-+
[7]   Evolutionary breakdown of pollination specialization in a Caribbean plant radiation [J].
Marten-Rodriguez, Silvana ;
Fenster, Charles B. ;
Agnarsson, Ingi ;
Skog, Laurence E. ;
Zimmer, Elizabeth A. .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2010, 188 (02) :403-417
[8]   EFFECTS OF NECTAR VOLUME AND CONCENTRATION ON SUGAR INTAKE RATES OF AUSTRALIAN HONEYEATERS (MELIPHAGIDAE) [J].
MITCHELL, RJ ;
PATON, DC .
OECOLOGIA, 1990, 83 (02) :238-246
[9]   Weber's Law, the Magnitude Effect and Discrimination of Sugar Concentrations in Nectar-Feeding Animals [J].
Nachev, Vladislav ;
Stich, Kai Petra ;
Winter, York .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (09)
[10]   The psychophysics of uneconomical choice: non-linear reward evaluation by a nectar feeder [J].
Nachev, Vladislav ;
Winter, York .
ANIMAL COGNITION, 2012, 15 (03) :393-400