Ergonomics contributions to company strategies

被引:207
作者
Dul, Jan [1 ]
Neumann, W. Patrick [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, Dept Management Technol & Innovat, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Ryerson Univ, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
关键词
Corporate strategy; System performance; Paradigm shift; PERFORMANCE WORK SYSTEMS; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; LEAN PRODUCTION; MEDIATING ROLE; ASSEMBLY WORK; QUALITY; PRODUCTIVITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2008.07.001
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Managers usually associate ergonomics with Occupational health and safety and related legislation, not with business performance. In many companies, these decision makers seem not to be positively motivated to apply ergonomics for reasons of improving health and safety. In order to strengthen the position of ergonomics and ergonomists in the business and management world, we discuss company strategies and business goals to which ergonomics could contribute. Conceptual models are presented and examples are given to illustrate: ( I) the present situation in which ergonomics is not part of regular planning and control cycles in organizations to ensure business performance; and (2) the desired situation in which ergonomics is an integrated part of strategy formulation and implementation. in order to realize the desired situation, considerable changes must take place within the ergonomics research, education and practice community by moving from a health ergonomics paradigm to a business ergonomics paradigm, without losing the health and safety goals. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 752
页数:8
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [1] Production economics analysis of investment initiated to improve working environment
    Abrahamsson, L
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2000, 31 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [2] Ergonomics, employee involvement, and the Toyota production system: A case study of Nummi's 1993 model introduction
    Adler, PS
    Goldoftas, B
    Levine, DI
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1997, 50 (03): : 416 - 437
  • [3] Assessing the work environment for creativity
    Amabile, TM
    Conti, R
    Coon, H
    Lazenby, J
    Herron, M
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 39 (05) : 1154 - 1184
  • [4] [Anonymous], CORPORATE ADVANTAGE
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1990, The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2000, DISC ERG
  • [7] [Anonymous], APPL ERGONOMICS
  • [8] [Anonymous], P 31 ANN C ASS CAN E
  • [9] Appelbaum E., 2000, Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off
  • [10] AXELSSON JRC, 2000, THESIS U LINKOPING L