Quantitative evaluation of the matrix effect in bioanalytical methods based on LC-MS: A comparison of two approaches

被引:43
作者
Rudzki, Piotr J. [1 ]
Gniazdowska, Elzbieta [1 ]
Bus-Kwasnik, Katarzyna [1 ]
机构
[1] Pharmaceut Res Inst, Pharmacokinet Dept, 8 Rydygiera St, PL-01793 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
Matrix effect; Matrix factor; Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry; Bioanalytical method validation; Pharmacokinetics; IONIZATION MASS-SPECTROMETRY; CLOUD-POINT EXTRACTION; HUMAN PLASMA; VALIDATION; BISOPROLOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpba.2018.03.052
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is a powerful tool for studying pharmacokinetics and toxicokinetics. Reliable bioanalysis requires the characterization of the matrix effect, i.e. influence of the endogenous or exogenous compounds on the analyte signal intensity. We have compared two methods for the quantitation of matrix effect. The CVs(%) of internal standard normalized matrix factors recommended by the European Medicines Agency were evaluated against internal standard normalized relative matrix effects derived from Matuszewski et al. (2003). Both methods use post-extraction spiked samples, but matrix factors require also neat solutions. We have tested both approaches using analytes of diverse chemical structures. The study did not reveal relevant differences in the results obtained with both calculation methods. After normalization with the internal standard, the CV(%) of the matrix factor was on average 0.5% higher than the corresponding relative matrix effect. The method adopted by the European Medicines Agency seems to be slightly more conservative in the analyzed datasets. Nine analytes of different structures enabled a general overview of the problem, still, further studies are encouraged to confirm our observations. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 319
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Simple approach for evaluation of matrix effect in the mass spectrometry of synthetic cannabinoids [J].
Adamowicz, P. ;
Wrzesien, W. .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2016, 71 (08) :794-802
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, DRAFT GUID IND BIOAN
[3]   Standardized Procedure for the Simultaneous Determination of the Matrix Effect, Recovery, Process Efficiency, and Internal Standard Association [J].
Bienvenu, Jean-Francois ;
Provencher, Gilles ;
Belanger, Patrick ;
Berube, Rene ;
Dumas, Pierre ;
Gagne, Sehastien ;
Gaudreau, Eric ;
Fleury, Normand .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2017, 89 (14) :7560-7568
[4]  
Bonfiglio R, 1999, RAPID COMMUN MASS SP, V13, P1175, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(19990630)13:12<1175::AID-RCM639>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-0
[6]  
Bus-Kwasnik K, 2016, ACTA POL PHARM, V73, P1487
[7]   Bioequivalence study of 2.5 mg film-coated bisoprolol tablets in healthy volunteers [J].
Bus-Kwasnik, Katarzyna ;
Rudzki, Piotr J. ;
Ksycinska, Hanna ;
Les, Andrzej ;
Serafin-Byczak, Krystyna ;
Raszek, Jerzy ;
Bielak, Agnieszka ;
Wybraniec, Andrzej ;
Platek, Anna E. ;
Szymanski, Filip M. ;
Lazowski, Tomasz .
KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2017, 75 (01) :48-54
[8]  
European Medicines Agency, 2011, GUID BIOAN METH VAL
[9]   Simplified LC-MS/MS method enabling the determination of azithromycin in human plasma after a low 100 mg dose administration [J].
Filist, Monika ;
Bus-Kwasnik, Katarzyna ;
Ksycinska, Hanna ;
Rudzki, Piotr J. .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 100 :184-189
[10]   Cloud-point extraction is compatible with liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for the determination of antazoline in human plasma [J].
Giebultowicz, Joanna ;
Kojro, Grzegorz ;
Piotrowski, Roman ;
Kulakowski, Piotr ;
Wroczynski, Piotr .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 128 :294-301