The role of primary care physician and cardiologist follow-up for low-risk patients with chest pain after emergency department assessment

被引:19
作者
Czarnecki, Andrew [1 ]
Wang, Julie T. [2 ]
Tu, Jack V. [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Douglas S. [2 ,3 ]
Schull, Michael J. [2 ,4 ]
Lau, Ching [1 ]
Farkouh, Michael E. [2 ,3 ]
Wijeysundera, Harindra C. [1 ,2 ]
Ko, Dennis T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Cardiol, Schulich Heart Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Div Cardiol, Peter Munk Cardiac Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Emergency Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2014.05.016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Chest pain is one of the most common reasons for presentation to the emergency department (ED); however, there is a paucity of data evaluating the impact of physician follow-up and subsequent management. To evaluate the impact of physician follow-up for low-risk chest pain patients after ED assessment. Methods We performed a retrospective observational study of low-risk chest pain patients who were assessed and discharged home from an Ontario ED. Low risk was defined as >= 50 years of age and no diabetes or preexisting cardiovascular disease. Follow-up within 30 days was stratified as (a) no physician, (b) primary care physician (PCP) alone, (c) PCP with cardiologist, and (d) cardiologist alone. The primary outcome was death or myocardial infarction (MI) at 1 year. Results Among 216,527 patients, 29% had no-physician, 60% had PCP-alone, 8% had PCP with cardiologist, and 4% had cardiologist-alone follow-up after ED discharge. The mean age of the study cohort was 64.2 years, and 42% of the patients were male. After adjusting for important differences in baseline characteristics between physician follow-up groups, the adjusted hazard ratios for death or MI were 1.07 (95% CI 1.00-1.14) for the PCP group, 0.81 (95% CI 0.72-0.91) for the PCP with cardiologist group, and 0.87 (95% CI 0.74-1.02) for the cardiologist alone group, as compared with patients who had no follow-up. Conclusion In this cohort of low-risk patients who presented to an ED with chest pain, follow-up with a PCP and cardiologist was associated with significantly reduced risk of death or MI at 1 year.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 295
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [31] Is radioiodine ablation with 1.1 GBq (30 mCi) 131I necessary in low-risk thyroid cancer patients? Results from a long-term follow-up prospective study
    Ilera, Veronica
    Califano, Ines
    Cavallo, Andrea
    Faure, Eduardo
    Vazquez, Adriana
    Pitoia, Fabian
    ENDOCRINE, 2023, 80 (03) : 606 - 611
  • [32] Meta-analysis of Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias After Improvement in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction During Follow-Up in Patients With Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
    Smer, Aiman
    Saurav, Alok
    Azzouz, Muhammad Soubhi
    Salih, Mohsin
    Ayan, Mohamed
    Abuzaid, Ahmed
    Akinapelli, Abhilash
    Kanmanthareddy, Arun
    Rosenfeld, Lynda E.
    Merchant, Faisal M.
    Abuissa, Hussam
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 120 (02) : 279 - 286
  • [33] No clinical effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate- and low-risk patients with severe aortic valve stenosis at mid-term follow-up: an analysis from the NOTION trialaEuro
    Thyregod, Hans Gustav Horsted
    Steinbruchel, Daniel Andreas
    Ihlemann, Nikolaj
    Thuc Anh Ngo
    Nissen, Henrik
    Kjeldsen, Bo Juel
    Chang, Yanping
    Hansen, Peter Bo
    Olsen, Peter Skov
    Sondergaard, Lars
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 50 (04) : 721 - 728