Implementation intentions forge a strong cue-response link and boost prospective memory performance

被引:10
|
作者
McCrea, Sean M. [1 ]
Penningroth, Suzanna L. [1 ]
Radakovich, Maurissa P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wyoming, Dept Psychol, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
关键词
Counterfactual thinking; Implementation intentions; Memory strategies; Prospective memory; Retrieval; COUNTERFACTUAL THINKING; DELAYED INTENTIONS; GOAL ACHIEVEMENT; EVALUATION MODEL; OLDER-ADULTS; TASK; REFLECTION; INITIATION; RETRIEVAL; PLANS;
D O I
10.1080/20445911.2014.975816
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Prospective memory (PM) performance (i.e., remembering to perform intentions) is often in the service of higher goals and thus could be improved through better self-regulation. We examined the effectiveness of three self-regulatory strategies in a laboratory event-based PM task: implementation intention (i.e., planning in an if/when-then format), rehearsal (i.e., planning not in an if/when-then format) and upward counterfactual ("if only..." thoughts about a past performance). The cue and response mentioned in all three strategies were held constant, such that only format and timing (past vs. future orientation) of the strategy varied. Results indicated that the implementation intention strategy strengthened the cue-response link and improved PM performance over baseline, relative to a control condition. Neither rehearsal nor counterfactual strategies had significant benefits, relative to a control condition. These findings suggest that the if/when-then plan format of implementation intentions may be a critical feature of their effectiveness in retrieving and executing intentions.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 26
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] Age effects in prospective memory performance within older adults: the paradoxical impact of implementation intentions
    Katharina Marlene Schnitzspahn
    Matthias Kliegel
    European Journal of Ageing, 2009, 6 : 147 - 155
  • [22] Investigating how implementation intentions improve non-focal prospective memory tasks
    Smith, Rebekah E.
    Rogers, Melissa D. McConnell
    McVay, Jennifer C.
    Lopez, Joshua A.
    Loft, Shayne
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2014, 27 : 213 - 230
  • [23] Is working memory necessary for implementation intentions to enhance prospective memory in older adults with cognitive problems?
    Burkard, Christina
    Rochat, Lucien
    Van der Linden, Anne-Claude Juillerat
    Gold, Gabriel
    Van der Linden, Martial
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2014, 3 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [24] Implementation intentions about nonfocal event-based prospective memory tasks
    Meeks, J. Thadeus
    Marsh, Richard L.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2010, 74 (01): : 82 - 89
  • [25] Implementation intentions and imagery: individual and combined effects on prospective memory among young adults
    Craig McFarland
    Elizabeth Glisky
    Memory & Cognition, 2012, 40 : 62 - 69
  • [26] Implementation-intention encoding in a prospective memory task enhances spontaneous retrieval of intentions
    Rummel, Jan
    Einstein, Gilles O.
    Rampey, Hilary
    MEMORY, 2012, 20 (08) : 803 - 817
  • [27] The role of temporal delay and repeated prospective memory cue exposure on the deactivation of completed intentions
    Moritz Walser
    Franziska Plessow
    Thomas Goschke
    Rico Fischer
    Psychological Research, 2014, 78 : 584 - 596
  • [28] The influence of high and low cue-action association on prospective memory performance
    Albinski, Rafal
    Kliegel, Matthias
    Gurynowicz, Kamila
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 28 (06) : 707 - 717
  • [29] The impact of age, ongoing task difficulty, and cue salience on preschoolers' prospective memory performance: The role of executive function
    Mahy, Caitlin E. V.
    Moses, Louis J.
    Kliegel, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 127 : 52 - 64
  • [30] Implementation intentions facilitate prospective memory under high attention demands
    Mark A. McDaniel
    Daniel C. Howard
    Karin M. Butler
    Memory & Cognition, 2008, 36 : 716 - 724