Zebra finches are able to learn affixation-like patterns

被引:11
作者
Chen, Jiani [1 ]
Jansen, Naomi [1 ]
ten Cate, Carel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Inst Biol Leiden, Sylvius Lab, Behav Biol, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Leiden Inst Brain & Cognit, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Affixation; Language evolution; Cognitive asymmetry; Songbird; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; SUFFIXING PREFERENCE; WORKING-MEMORY; SONG DIALECTS; LANGUAGE; DISCRIMINATION; INFORMATION; ACQUISITION; SONGBIRDS; ABILITIES;
D O I
10.1007/s10071-015-0913-x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Adding an affix to transform a word is common across the world languages, with the edges of words more likely to carry out such a function. However, detecting affixation patterns is also observed in learning tasks outside the domain of language, suggesting that the underlying mechanism from which affixation patterns have arisen may not be language or even human specific. We addressed whether a songbird, the zebra finch, is able to discriminate between, and generalize, affixation-like patterns. Zebra finches were trained and tested in a Go/Nogo paradigm to discriminate artificial song element sequences resembling prefixed and suffixed 'words.' The 'stems' of the 'words,' consisted of different combinations of a triplet of song elements, to which a fourth element was added as either a 'prefix' or a 'suffix.' After training, the birds were tested with novel stems, consisting of either rearranged familiar element types or novel element types. The birds were able to generalize the affixation patterns to novel stems with both familiar and novel element types. Hence, the discrimination resulting from the training was not based on memorization of individual stimuli, but on a shared property among Go or Nogo stimuli, i.e., affixation patterns. Remarkably, birds trained with suffixation as Go pattern showed clear evidence of using both prefix and suffix, while those trained with the prefix as the Go stimulus used primarily the prefix. This finding illustrates that an asymmetry in attending to different affixations is not restricted to human languages.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 73
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Songs to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong [J].
Berwick, Robert C. ;
Okanoya, Kazuo ;
Beckers, Gabriel J. L. ;
Bolhuis, Johan J. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2011, 15 (03) :113-121
[2]  
Bolhuis JJ, 2013, BIRDSONG, SPEECH, AND LANGUAGE: EXPLORING THE EVOLUTION OF MIND AND BRAIN, P1
[3]   Twitter evolution: converging mechanisms in birdsong and human speech [J].
Bolhuis, Johan J. ;
Okanoya, Kazuo ;
Scharff, Constance .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 11 (11) :747-759
[4]  
Bybee Joan L., 1990, Studies in Typology and Diachrony for Joseph H. Greenberg
[5]   Artificial grammar learning in zebra finches and human adults: XYX versus XXY [J].
Chen, Jiani ;
van Rossum, Danielle ;
ten Cate, Carel .
ANIMAL COGNITION, 2015, 18 (01) :151-164
[6]  
Clark E.V., 1991, PERSPECTIVES LANGUAG
[7]   Auditory temporal pattern learning by songbirds using maximal stimulus diversity and minimal repetition [J].
Comins, Jordan A. ;
Gentner, Timothy Q. .
ANIMAL COGNITION, 2014, 17 (05) :1023-1030
[8]   Working memory for patterned sequences of auditory objects in a songbird [J].
Comins, Jordan A. ;
Gentner, Timothy Q. .
COGNITION, 2010, 117 (01) :38-53
[9]   THE SUFFIXING PREFERENCE, A PROCESSING EXPLANATION [J].
CUTLER, A ;
HAWKINS, JA ;
GILLIGAN, G .
LINGUISTICS, 1985, 23 (05) :723-758
[10]   Birdsong and human speech: Common themes and mechanisms [J].
Doupe, AJ ;
Kuhl, PK .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 22 :567-631