Bringing Back the System: One Reason Why Conservatives are Happier Than Liberals is That Higher Socioeconomic Status Gives Them Access to More Group Memberships

被引:35
作者
Jetten, Jolanda [1 ]
Haslam, S. Alexander [2 ]
Barlow, Fiona Kate [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Exeter, Washington Singer Labs, Exeter, Devon, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
multiple group membership; political orientation; well-being; social capital; system-justifying ideology; social class; SOCIAL-DOMINANCE; SELF-ESTEEM; ATTITUDES; IDENTITY; LIFE; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1177/1948550612439721
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Why are conservatives happier than liberals? Napier and Jost (2008) argue that this is because conservative ideology has a palliative (system-justifying) function that protects conservatives' (but not liberals') happiness. We develop another rationale for this effect and argue that we need to examine how ideology (e. g., conservatism) is embedded in the social system and people's own place within it. In a study (N = 816), we find that conservatives are more satisfied with life than liberals and that conservatism is associated with higher socioeconomic status (SES). Taking SES as a starting point, we find that those with high SES have access to more group memberships and that this is associated with higher life satisfaction. We failed to replicate Napier and Jost's finding that system-justifying ideology mediated the relationship between conservatism and life satisfaction. We conclude that conservatives may be happier than liberals because their high SES gives them access to more group memberships.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 13
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women
    Adler, NE
    Epel, ES
    Castellazzo, G
    Ickovics, JR
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 19 (06) : 586 - 592
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1999, Social Dominance, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139175043
  • [3] Argyle M., 1994, PSYCHOL SOCIAL CLASS
  • [4] Ball S.J., 2002, RACE ETHNIC EDUC-UK, V5, P333, DOI [10.1080/1361332022000030879, DOI 10.1080/1361332022000030879]
  • [5] Bourdieu Pierre, DISTINCTION SOCIAL C
  • [6] Can We Improve Our Physical Health by Altering Our Social Networks?
    Cohen, Sheldon
    Janicki-Deverts, Denise
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 4 (04) : 375 - 378
  • [7] DIENER E, 1995, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V68, P653, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.120
  • [8] Fiske S. T., BRIT J SOCI IN PRESS, V32, P5
  • [9] Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions
    Guimond, S
    Dambrun, M
    Michinov, N
    Duarte, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 84 (04) : 697 - 721
  • [10] Maintaining group memberships: Social identity continuity predicts well-being after stroke
    Haslam, Catherine
    Holme, Abigail
    Haslam, S. Alexander
    Iyer, Aarti
    Jetten, Jolanda
    Williams, W. Huw
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2008, 18 (5-6) : 671 - 691