Beyond Agreeableness: Social-relational personality concepts from an indigenous and cross-cultural perspective

被引:17
作者
Valchev, Velichko H. [1 ,2 ]
van de Vijver, Fons J. R. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Meiring, Deon [2 ]
Nel, J. Alewyn [3 ]
Hill, Carin [5 ]
Laher, Sumaya [6 ]
Adams, Byron G. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Dept Cross Cultural Psychol, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Univ Pretoria, Dept Human Resource Management, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
[3] North West Univ, WorkWell Res Unit Econ & Management Sci, Potchefstroom, South Africa
[4] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[5] Univ Johannesburg, Dept Ind Psychol & People Management, Johannesburg, South Africa
[6] Univ Witwatersrand, Dept Psychol, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa
关键词
Big Five; Agreeableness; Interpersonal Relatedness; Social desirability; Prosocialness; Indigenous and cross-cultural research; IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT; DESIRABILITY SCALES; SELF; CHINESE; DIMENSIONS; TRAITS; IMPLICIT; INVENTORIES; CONSTRUCT; LANGUAGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrp.2013.10.003
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The links of social-relational concepts (SRC) of personality identified in South Africa with the Five Factor Model (FFM), Interpersonal Relatedness (IR), social desirability, and prosocialness were examined. In Study 1 (N = 1483), the SRC defined two factors (positive and negative) distinct from the FFM, more strongly linked to relational than to tradition-focused IR aspects and to impression management than to deception. Links to tradition-focused concepts were stronger, and scores on positive SRC higher in Blacks than in Whites. In Study 2 (N = 325), SRC explained substantial variance in prosocialness above the FFM. In Study 3 (N = 1283), the SRC were replicated in a Dutch multicultural sample. The findings suggest expanding the FFM with respect to social-relational functioning. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 32
页数:16
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Toward a geography of personality traits - Patterns of profiles across 36 cultures [J].
Allik, J ;
McCrae, RR .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 35 (01) :13-28
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Psychology Assessment, DOI [10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26, DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26, https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26]
[3]  
[Anonymous], AMOS
[4]  
April K., 2011, Asia Pacific Journal of Business and Management, V2, P5
[5]   Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure [J].
Ashton, Michael C. ;
Lee, Kibeom .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2007, 11 (02) :150-166
[6]   From adorable to worthless:: Implicit and self-report structure of highly evaluative personality descriptors [J].
Benet-Martínez, V ;
Waller, NG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2002, 16 (01) :1-41
[7]  
Buss D.M., 1997, Handbook of Personality Psychology, P317
[8]   EVOLUTIONARY PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY [J].
BUSS, DM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 42 :459-491
[9]   The Contribution of Agreeableness and Self-efficacy Beliefs to Prosociality [J].
Caprara, Gian Vittorio ;
Alessandri, Guido ;
Di Giunta, Laura ;
Panerai, Laura ;
Eisenberg, Nancy .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2010, 24 (01) :36-55
[10]   A new scale for measuring adults' prosocialness [J].
Caprara, GV ;
Steca, P ;
Zelli, A ;
Capanna, C .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2005, 21 (02) :77-89