Interpretation of clinical endpoints in trials of acute myeloid leukemia

被引:33
作者
Medeiros, Bruno C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, 875 Blake Wilbur Dr, Stanford, CA USA
关键词
AML; Leukemia; Clinical trial; Endpoint; FREE SURVIVAL; SUBGROUP ANALYSES; PART I; DISEASE; CANCER; AML; RECOMMENDATIONS; CHEMOTHERAPY; DIAGNOSIS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.leukres.2018.02.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Treatment regimens for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have remained largely unchanged until recently. Molecular advances have opened the door to targeted therapies, many of which are in late-phase clinical trials. As new therapeutic opportunities arise, it is appropriate to review key aspects of clinical trial design, statistical interpretation of outcomes, and methods of data reporting. Complete remission and overall survival (OS) are common primary endpoints in early-phase AML clinical trials. OS and event-free survival are frequent primary endpoints in phase 3 trials. Clinical trials are designed to address the primary endpoint using prespecified a and power levels. Interpretation of additional endpoints (eg, secondary endpoints and subgroup analyses) must be viewed in light of a trial's statistical design. Furthermore, variations in reporting of endpoints must be considered in order to understand trial outcomes. Time-to-event endpoints are typically reported using Kaplan-Meier curves, which are visually informative. Statistical data derived from these curves can be complex, and a variety of factors may impact interpretation. The purpose of this review is to discuss the nuances of common AML trial endpoints and their data presentation to better inform evaluation and understanding of clinical trial data.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 39
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PROBABILITY EQUATION
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, CLIN ETHICS, DOI [10.1258/147775007781029537, DOI 10.1258/147775007781029537]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, VYX DAUN CYT PACK IN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, MYL GEMT OZ PACK INS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, IDH EN PACK INS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Survivorship
[7]   End points to establish the efficacy of new agents in the treatment of acute leukemia [J].
Appelbaum, Frederick R. ;
Rosenblum, Daniel ;
Arceci, Robert J. ;
Carroll, William L. ;
Breitfeld, Philip P. ;
Forman, Stephen J. ;
Larson, Richard A. ;
Lee, Stephanie J. ;
Murphy, Sharon B. ;
O'Brien, Susan ;
Radich, Jerald ;
Scher, Nancy S. ;
Smith, Franklin O. ;
Stone, Richard M. ;
Tallman, Martin S. .
BLOOD, 2007, 109 (05) :1810-1816
[8]   Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Lee, Douglas S. ;
Fine, Jason P. .
CIRCULATION, 2016, 133 (06) :601-609
[9]  
Bakhai B., 2006, CLIN TRIALS PRACTICA, P37
[10]   Variables with time-varying effects and the Cox model: Some statistical concepts illustrated with a prognostic factor study in breast cancer [J].
Bellera, Carine A. ;
MacGrogan, Gaetan ;
Debled, Marc ;
de lara, Christine Tunon ;
Brouste, Veronique ;
Mathoulin-Pelissier, Simone .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2010, 10