CEO political ideologies and auditor-client contracting

被引:33
作者
Bhandari, Avishek [1 ]
Golden, Joanna [2 ]
Thevenot, Maya [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Whitewater, WI 53190 USA
[2] Univ Memphis, 219 Fogelman Coll Admin Bldg, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
[3] Florida Atlantic Univ, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
关键词
CEO political ideologies; Auditor-client contracting; Audit quality; Audit fees; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; BUSINESS RISK; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; MANAGERIAL ABILITY; NONAUDIT SERVICES; UPPER ECHELONS; FEES; IMPACT; CONSERVATISM; CONNECTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2020.106755
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigate whether CEOs' political ideology, as captured by their political contributions, is related to audit risk and, consequently, to audit pricing. We find that Republican CEOs are associated with lower inherent risk and control risk, which represent the two components of audit risk related to the firm, while their Democratic counterparts are seen to have higher risks. Consequently, Republican (Democratic) CEOs are associated with lower (higher) audit fees. The results are robust to controlling for religiosity, executive incentives and ability, obtaining alternative measures of inherent and control risk, and to using propensity score matching and entropy balancing. We further show that changes in political ideology are associated with changes in audit risk and fees. In sum, the evidence implies that auditors view the political ideology of CEOs as an important determinant of engagement risk, which may have important implications for disclosure policy. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Earnings management, litigation risk, and asymmetric audit fee responses [J].
Abbott, Lawrence J. ;
Parker, Susan ;
Peters, Gary F. .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2006, 25 (01) :85-98
[2]   Why is there so little money in US politics? [J].
Ansolabehere, S ;
de Figueiredo, JM ;
Snyder, JM .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2003, 17 (01) :105-130
[3]   Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence [J].
Ashbaugh, H ;
LaFond, R ;
Mayhew, BW .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2003, 78 (03) :611-639
[4]   The effects of judgments of new clients' integrity upon risk judgments, audit evidence, and fees [J].
Beaulieu, PR .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2001, 20 (02) :85-99
[5]   Auditors' perceived business risk and audit fees: Analysis and evidence [J].
Bell, TB ;
Landsman, WR ;
Shackelford, DA .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2001, 39 (01) :35-43
[6]  
Bell TB, 2008, J ACCOUNT RES, V46, P729, DOI 10.1111/j.H75-679X.2008.00291.x
[7]   It Is Not Only What You Know, It Is Also Who You Know: CEO Network Connections and Financial Reporting Quality [J].
Bhandari, Avishek ;
Mammadov, Babak ;
Shelton, Austin ;
Thevenot, Maya .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2018, 37 (02) :27-50
[8]   CEO and CFO Equity Incentives and the Pricing of Audit Services [J].
Billings, Anthony ;
Gao, Xinghua ;
Jia, Yonghong .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2014, 33 (02) :1-25
[9]   CEO IDEOLOGY AS AN ELEMENT OF THE CORPORATE OPPORTUNITY STRUCTURE FOR SOCIAL ACTIVISTS [J].
Briscoe, Forrest ;
Chin, M. K. ;
Hambrick, Donald C. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 57 (06) :1786-1809
[10]   The Audit Committee: Management Watchdog or Personal Friend of the CEO? [J].
Bruynseels, Liesbeth ;
Cardinaels, Eddy .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2014, 89 (01) :113-145