Attentional Changes During Implicit Learning: Signal Validity Protects a Target Stimulus From the Attentional Blink

被引:31
作者
Livesey, Evan J. [1 ]
Harris, Irina M. [1 ]
Harris, Justin A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
predictive learning; attentional blink; signal validity; implicit learning; DISTRACTOR INHIBITION; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; TASK; ASSOCIABILITY; BLOCKING; MODEL; UNBLOCKING; AWARENESS; SURPRISE; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1037/a0014525
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Participants in 2 experiments performed 2 simultaneous tasks: one, a dual-target detection task within a rapid sequence of target and distractor letters; the other, a cued reaction time task requiring participants to make a cued left-right response immediately after each letter sequence. Under these rapid visual presentation conditions, it is usually difficult to identify the 2nd target when it is presented in temporal proximity of the 1st target-a phenomenon known as the attentional blink. However, here participants showed an advantage for detecting a target presented during the attentional blink if that target predicted which response cue would appear at the end of the trial. Participants also showed faster reaction times on trials with a predictive target. Both of these effects were independent of conscious knowledge of the target-response contingencies assessed by postexperiment questionnaires. The results suggest that implicit learning of the association between a predictive target and its outcome can automatically facilitate target recognition during the attentional blink and therefore shed new light on the relationship between associative learning and attentional mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 422
页数:15
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
BOAKES RA, 1995, PERSPECTIVES COGNITI, P1
[2]   Sequence learning in a dual-stimulus setting [J].
Cleeremans, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 1997, 60 (1-2) :72-86
[3]   Loci of signal probability effects and of the attentional blink bottleneck [J].
Crebolder, JM ;
Jolicoeur, P ;
McIlwaine, JD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2002, 28 (03) :695-716
[4]   Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism [J].
Deubel, H ;
Schneider, WX .
VISION RESEARCH, 1996, 36 (12) :1827-1837
[5]   REINFORCER SPECIFICITY IN THE ENHANCEMENT OF CONDITIONING BY POST-TRIAL SURPRISE [J].
DICKINSON, A ;
MACKINTOSH, NJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 1979, 5 (02) :162-177
[6]   SURPRISE AND ATTENUATION OF BLOCKING [J].
DICKINSON, A ;
HALL, G ;
MACKINTOSH, NJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 1976, 2 (04) :313-322
[7]   On the failure of distractor inhibition in the attentional blink [J].
Dux, Paul E. ;
Harris, Irina M. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (04) :723-728
[8]   On the fate of distractor stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation [J].
Dux, PE ;
Coltheart, V ;
Harris, IA .
COGNITION, 2006, 99 (03) :355-382
[9]   IMPLICIT LEARNING OF UNIQUE AND AMBIGUOUS SERIAL TRANSITIONS IN THE PRESENCE AND ABSENCE OF A DISTRACTOR TASK [J].
FRENSCH, PA ;
BUCHNER, A ;
LIN, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1994, 20 (03) :567-584
[10]   Learning versus behavioral expression of the learned: The effects of a secondary tone-counting task on implicit learning in the serial reaction task [J].
Frensch, PA ;
Lin, J ;
Buchner, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 1998, 61 (02) :83-98