Spinal stenosis, back pain, or no symptoms at all? A masked study comparing radiologic and electrodiagnostic diagnoses to the clinical impression

被引:63
作者
Haig, AJ
Tong, HC
Yamakawa, KS
Quint, DJ
Hoff, JT
Chiodo, A
Miner, JA
Choksi, VR
Geisser, ME
Parres, CM
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Med Ctr, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Spine Program, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Neurosurg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2006年 / 87卷 / 07期
关键词
back pain; electrodiagnosis; magnetic resonance imaging; referral and consultation; rehabilitation; spinal stenosis;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2006.03.016
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the relations between clinically recognized lumbar spinal stenosis and the conclusions of masked radiologists and electrodiagnosticians. Design: Prospective, masked, double-controlled trial. Setting: University spine center. Participants: One hundred fifty persons age 55 to 80 years with or without back pain and with or without magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-demonstrated stenosis, screened for neuropathy risk, previous surgery, or cancer. Interventions: Questionnaires on pain and function; ambulation testing and physical examination; and masked electrodiagnotics and MRI. Main Outcome Measure: Diagnostic impressions of the examining, clinician, radiologist, and electrodiagnostician. Results: Following application of post hoc exclusion criteria and elimination of patients due to incomplete or inadequate test data, the clinical diagnosis was lumbar stenosis in 50 subjects, back pain in 44 subjects, and no pain in 32 subjects. Radiologic and clinical impression had no relation (P=.80 vs asymptomatic, P=.99 vs back pain controls). Electrodiagnostic impression trended to relate to clinical impression (P=.14 vs asymptomatic. P=.09 vs back pain). Retrospective application of age-related electrodiagnostic norms for paraspinal electromyographic and limb motor unit changes, established in this study, reclassified 13 of the 17 asymptomatic persons whom the electrodiagnostician thought had stenosis. The clinical impression did correspond to history and physical examination findings typically associated with spinal stenosis and to the independent impression of a neurosurgeon who examined MRI and clinical, but not to the electrodi agnostic data. Conclusions: The impression obtained from an MRI scan does not determine whether lumbar stenosis is a cause of pain. Electrodiagnostic consultation may be useful, especially if age-related norms obtained in this study are applied.
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 903
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
*AG HEALTHC POL RE, 2001, TREATM DEG LUMB SPIN
[2]  
Andersson Gunnar B. J., 1997, P93
[3]   Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain [J].
Bijur, PE ;
Silver, W ;
Gallagher, EJ .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 8 (12) :1153-1157
[4]   ABNORMAL MAGNETIC-RESONANCE SCANS OF THE LUMBAR SPINE IN ASYMPTOMATIC SUBJECTS - A PROSPECTIVE INVESTIGATION [J].
BODEN, SD ;
DAVIS, DO ;
DINA, TS ;
PATRONAS, NJ ;
WIESEL, SW .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1990, 72A (03) :403-408
[5]   LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS AND DIABETES - OUTCOME OF SURGICAL DECOMPRESSION [J].
CINOTTI, G ;
POSTACCHINI, F ;
WEINSTEIN, JN .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1994, 76B (02) :215-219
[6]  
DAUBE JR, 1991, MUSCLE NERVE, V14, P685
[7]  
DEYO RA, 1993, SPINE, V18, P1463
[8]   WHAT CAN THE HISTORY AND PHYSICAL-EXAMINATION TELL US ABOUT LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
DEYO, RA ;
RAINVILLE, J ;
KENT, DL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (06) :760-765
[9]   Identifying lumbosacral radiculopathies - An optimal electromyographic screen [J].
Dillingham, TR ;
Lauder, TD ;
Andary, M ;
Kumar, S ;
Pezzin, LE ;
Stephens, RT ;
Shannon, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2000, 79 (06) :496-503
[10]   Efficacy and validity of radiofrequency neurotomy for chronic lumbar zygapophysial joint pain [J].
Dreyfuss, P ;
Halbrook, B ;
Pauza, K ;
Joshi, A .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (10) :1270-1277