Sustaining SBIRT in the wild: simulating revenues and costs for Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs

被引:13
|
作者
Cowell, Alexander J. [1 ]
Dowd, William N. [1 ]
Mills, Michael J. [1 ]
Hinde, Jesse M. [1 ]
Bray, Jeremy W. [2 ]
机构
[1] RTI Int, 3040 Cornwallis Rd,POB 12194, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Greensboro, Bryan Sch Business & Econ, Greensboro, NC USA
关键词
Cost; health insurance; revenue; SBIRT; screening and brief intervention; simulation; sustainability; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; BRIEF ALCOHOL INTERVENTION; BRIEF PHYSICIAN ADVICE; PRIMARY-CARE; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; PROBLEM DRINKERS; DRINKING; SETTINGS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1111/add.13650
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims To examine the conditions under which Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) programs can be sustained by health insurance payments. Design A mathematical model was used to estimate the number of patients needed for revenues to exceed costs. Setting Three medical settings in the United States were examined: in-patient, out-patient and emergency department. Components of SBIRT were delivered by combinations of health-care practitioners (generalists) and behavioral health specialists. Participants Practitioners in seven SBIRT programs who received grants from the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Measurements Program costs and revenues were measured using data from grantees. Patient flows were measured from administrative data and adjusted with prevalence and screening estimates from the literature. Findings SBIRT can be sustained through health insurance reimbursement in out-patient and emergency department settings in most staffing mixes. To sustain SBIRT in in-patient programs, a patient flow larger than the national average may be needed; if that flow is achieved, the range of screens required to maintain a surplus is narrow. Sensitivity analyses suggest that the results are very sensitive to changes in the proportion of insured patients. Conclusions Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs in the United States can be sustained by health insurance payments under a variety of staffing models. Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs can be sustained only in an in-patient setting with above-average patient flow (more than 2500 screens). Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs in out-patient and emergency department settings can be sustained with below-average patient flows (fewer than 125 000 out-patient visits and fewer than 27 000 emergency department visits).
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 109
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Screening Women for At-Risk Alcohol Use: An Introduction to Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) in Women's Health
    Shogren, Maridee D.
    Harsell, Christine
    Heitkamp, Thomasine
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2017, 62 (06) : 746 - 754
  • [42] Screening, Brief Intervention, Referral, and Treatment, references
    Bernstein, Steven L.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 16 (11) : 1054 - 1059
  • [43] Substance Use Screening using Virtual Agents Towards Automated Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT)
    Bickmore, Timothy
    Rubin, Amy
    Simon, Steven
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT VIRTUAL AGENTS (ACM IVA 2020), 2020,
  • [44] The relationship between services delivered and substance use outcomes in New Mexico's Screening, Brief Intervention, Referral and Treatment (SBIRT) Initiative
    Gryczynski, Jan
    Mitchell, Shannon Gwin
    Peterson, Thomas R.
    Gonzales, Arturo
    Moseley, Ana
    Schwartz, Robert P.
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2011, 118 (2-3) : 152 - 157
  • [45] A statewide screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) curriculum for medical residents: Differential implementation strategies in heterogeneous medical residency programs
    Pringle, Janice L.
    Kearney, Shannon M.
    Rickard-Aasen, Sherry
    Campopiano, Melinda M.
    Gordon, Adam J.
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2017, 38 (02) : 161 - 167
  • [46] Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment
    Borus, Joshua
    Parhami, Iman
    Levy, Sharon
    CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 25 (04) : 579 - +
  • [47] Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for tobacco consumption, alcohol misuse, and physical inactivity: an equity-informed rapid review
    Adhikari, K.
    Teare, G. F.
    Belon, A. P.
    Lee, B.
    Kim, M. O.
    Nykiforuk, C.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 226 : 237 - 247
  • [48] Interactive Computer Simulation for Adolescent Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for Substance Use in an Undergraduate Nursing Program
    Burmester, Katie A.
    Ahluwalia, Jai P.
    Ploutz-Snyder, Robert J.
    Strobbe, Stephen
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2019, 49 : 31 - 36
  • [49] Implementation of a "Learner-Driven" Curriculum: An Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) Interdisciplinary Primary Care Model
    Stanton, Marina R.
    Atherton, W. Leigh
    Toriello, Paul J.
    Hodgson, Jennifer L.
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2012, 33 (03) : 312 - 315
  • [50] Evaluation of a Pediatric Resident Skills-Based Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) Curriculum for Substance Use
    Ryan, Sheryl
    Pantalon, Michael V.
    Camenga, Deepa
    Martel, Shara
    D'Onofrio, Gail
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2018, 63 (03) : 327 - 334