Sustaining SBIRT in the wild: simulating revenues and costs for Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs

被引:13
|
作者
Cowell, Alexander J. [1 ]
Dowd, William N. [1 ]
Mills, Michael J. [1 ]
Hinde, Jesse M. [1 ]
Bray, Jeremy W. [2 ]
机构
[1] RTI Int, 3040 Cornwallis Rd,POB 12194, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Greensboro, Bryan Sch Business & Econ, Greensboro, NC USA
关键词
Cost; health insurance; revenue; SBIRT; screening and brief intervention; simulation; sustainability; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; BRIEF ALCOHOL INTERVENTION; BRIEF PHYSICIAN ADVICE; PRIMARY-CARE; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; PROBLEM DRINKERS; DRINKING; SETTINGS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1111/add.13650
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims To examine the conditions under which Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) programs can be sustained by health insurance payments. Design A mathematical model was used to estimate the number of patients needed for revenues to exceed costs. Setting Three medical settings in the United States were examined: in-patient, out-patient and emergency department. Components of SBIRT were delivered by combinations of health-care practitioners (generalists) and behavioral health specialists. Participants Practitioners in seven SBIRT programs who received grants from the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Measurements Program costs and revenues were measured using data from grantees. Patient flows were measured from administrative data and adjusted with prevalence and screening estimates from the literature. Findings SBIRT can be sustained through health insurance reimbursement in out-patient and emergency department settings in most staffing mixes. To sustain SBIRT in in-patient programs, a patient flow larger than the national average may be needed; if that flow is achieved, the range of screens required to maintain a surplus is narrow. Sensitivity analyses suggest that the results are very sensitive to changes in the proportion of insured patients. Conclusions Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs in the United States can be sustained by health insurance payments under a variety of staffing models. Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs can be sustained only in an in-patient setting with above-average patient flow (more than 2500 screens). Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs in out-patient and emergency department settings can be sustained with below-average patient flows (fewer than 125 000 out-patient visits and fewer than 27 000 emergency department visits).
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 109
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) in Primary Care in Integrated Health Care Settings
    Rahm, Alanna Kulchak
    Boggs, Jennifer M.
    Martin, Carmen
    Price, David W.
    Beck, Arne
    Backer, Thomas E.
    Dearing, James W.
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2015, 36 (03) : 281 - 288
  • [22] Ten years of implementing screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT): Lessons learned
    Nunes, Ana P.
    Richmond, Melissa K.
    Marzano, Kelly
    Swenson, Carolyn J.
    Lockhart, Jodi
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2017, 38 (04) : 508 - 512
  • [23] Interprofessional Student Training: An Evaluation of Teaching Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT)
    Kobayashi, Rie
    Schwartz, Catrina R.
    Willson, Megan N.
    Clauser, Janelle M.
    Mann, Donna P.
    Purath, Janet
    Davis, April
    Hahn, Patricia L.
    DePriest, Dawn M.
    Tuell, Erica J.
    Odom-Maryon, Tamara L.
    Bray, Brenda S.
    Richardson, Barbara B.
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE IN THE ADDICTIONS, 2019, 19 (1-2) : 26 - 46
  • [24] A pilot study of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral for Treatment (SBIRT) in non-treatment seeking smokers with HIV
    Cropsey, Karen L.
    Hendricks, Peter S.
    Jardin, Bianca
    Clark, C. Brendan
    Katiyar, Nandan
    Willig, James
    Mugavero, Michael
    Raper, James L.
    Saag, Michael
    Carpenter, Matthew J.
    ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2013, 38 (10) : 2541 - 2546
  • [25] Integrating Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for Substance Use into Prenatal Care
    Jean C. Hostage
    Julia Brock
    Wendy Craig
    Debra Sepulveda
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2020, 24 : 412 - 418
  • [26] Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) implementation in urban underserved family medicine
    Bednar, Hannah
    Bergs, Katherine
    Serdarevic, Mirsada
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN MEDICINE, 2024, 59 (04) : 432 - 438
  • [27] Screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT): implementation barriers, facilitators and model migration
    Vendetti, Janice
    Gmyrek, Amanda
    Damon, Donna
    Singh, Manu
    McRee, Bonnie
    Del Boca, Frances
    ADDICTION, 2017, 112 : 23 - 33
  • [28] Implementation of screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) in the emergency department without additional resources
    Janice L Pringle
    Sherry Rickard-Aasen
    Tamara Slain
    Arvind Venkat
    Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 8 (Suppl 1)
  • [29] A Community-Based Evaluation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for the Black Community
    Green, Helena D.
    QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2018, 28 (03) : 418 - 432
  • [30] Workflow Improvement and the Use of PDSA Cycles: An Exploration Using Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) Integration
    Moser, Tami
    Edwards, Jorie
    Pryor, Frannie
    Manson, Lesley
    O'Hare, Caroline
    QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2020, 29 (02) : 100 - 108