Family decision maker perspectives on the return of genetic results in biobanking research

被引:16
作者
Siminoff, Laura A. [1 ]
Traino, Heather M. [1 ]
Mosavel, Maghboeba [2 ]
Barker, Laura [2 ]
Gudger, Glencora [2 ]
Undale, Anita [3 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Social & Behav Hlth, Richmond, VA USA
[3] Leidos Biomed Res Inc, Reston, VA USA
关键词
biobanking; bioethical issues; genetic research; incidental findings; return of results; INCIDENTAL-FINDINGS; INFORMED-CONSENT; GENOMIC BIOBANKS; TISSUE DONATION; PARTICIPANTS; RELATIVES; PREFERENCES; CHALLENGES; EXOME;
D O I
10.1038/gim.2015.38
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose: There are many ethical considerations regarding the return of genetic results to biobanking participants, especially when biobanks collect samples from deceased organ and tissue donors that require the authorization of a family decision maker (FDM). This article explores FDM knowledge and opinions regarding return of genetic results in the context of the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Project, which does not return results to participants. Methods: Data collection included a survey completed by Organ Procurement Organization requesters (n = 22) and semistructured telephone interviews with FDM (n = 55). Results: Nearly every FDM wanted some form of genetic results returned. Information regarding treatable diseases (94.3%) and diseases that could affect their children (84.9%) were more desirable than that regarding untreatable diseases (71.7%). Sixty percent of FDMs understood that GTEx would not return genetic results. FDMs were four times more likely to have correct knowledge of the GTEx policy when their GTEx requester reported discussing the topic with them. Conclusion: FDMs from the GTEx project were interested in receiving genetic test results. Marked changes in the infrastructure of the GTEx would be required to alter the policy. Regardless, care must be taken to ensure that the return policy is clearly communicated with FDMs to dispel misconceptions.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 88
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, SAS SYST WIND COMP P
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, IBM SPSS STAT WIND C
  • [3] FALSE HOPES AND BEST DATA - CONSENT TO RESEARCH AND THE THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION
    APPELBAUM, PS
    ROTH, LH
    LIDZ, CW
    BENSON, P
    WINSLADE, W
    [J]. HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1987, 17 (02) : 20 - 24
  • [4] Preferences regarding Genetic Research Results: Comparing Veterans and Nonveterans Responses
    Arar, N.
    Seo, J.
    Lee, S.
    Abboud, H. E.
    Copeland, L. A.
    Noel, P.
    Parchman, M.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2010, 13 (7-8) : 431 - 439
  • [5] Informed consent for biorepositories: Assessing prospective participants' understanding and opinions
    Beskow, Laura M.
    Dean, Elizabeth
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2008, 17 (06) : 1440 - 1451
  • [6] Offering Individual Genetic Research Results: Context Matters
    Beskow, Laura M.
    Burke, Wylie
    [J]. SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2010, 2 (38)
  • [7] Practical implementation issues and challenges for biobanks in the return of individual research results
    Bledsoe, Marianna J.
    Grizzle, William E.
    Clark, Brian J.
    Zeps, Nikolajs
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (04) : 478 - 483
  • [8] Public preferences regarding the return of individual genetic research results: findings from a qualitative focus group study
    Bollinger, Juli Murphy
    Scott, Joan
    Dvoskin, Rachel
    Kaufman, David
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (04) : 451 - 457
  • [9] Risks to Relatives in Genomic Research: A Duty to Warn?
    Bombard, Yvonne
    Offit, Kenneth
    Robson, Mark E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2012, 12 (10) : 12 - 14
  • [10] Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered
    Bredenoord, Annelien L.
    Kroes, Hester Y.
    Cuppen, Edwin
    Parker, Michael
    van Delden, Johannes J. M.
    [J]. TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2011, 27 (02) : 41 - 47