Study of Prioritization Techniques using Students as subjects

被引:10
作者
Danesh, Amir Seyed [1 ]
Ahmad, Rodina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Dept Software Engn, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
来源
2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS | 2009年
关键词
Requirements engineering; Prioritization techniques; AHP;
D O I
10.1109/ICIME.2009.37
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In many software development projects there are more candidate requirements. Most projects are also constrained by budget and time; therefore it is often difficult to implement all requirements that have been elicited for a system. For prioritization purposes, many approaches have been proposed so far to help the process. Several empirical studies have been conducted to analyze characteristics of the available approaches, but their results are often difficult to compare. In this paper, a study designed at evaluating two requirements prioritization techniques, AHP and Numeral assignment technique is discussed. The study used students as subjects to prioritize requirements from an estate agency system and a library information system. Two groups of students, one from requirements engineering classroom and another group consists of research students participate in the study. The results reaffirm previous study that AHIP gives more accurate and more informative result than the numeral assignment technique.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 394
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
ABRAN A, 2001, SWEBOK GUIDE SOFTWAR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, SOFTWARE ENG
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, INT S AN HIER PROC K, DOI DOI 10.13033/ISAHP.Y1999.038
[4]  
[Anonymous], THESIS HUT
[5]   A validation of object-oriented design metrics as quality indicators [J].
Basili, VR ;
Briand, LC ;
Melo, WL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 1996, 22 (10) :751-761
[6]  
Berander P., 2005, Engineering and Managing Software Requirements
[7]  
Berander P., 2006, 6 C SOFTW ENG RES PR
[8]  
BRACKET JW, 1990, SEICM191 CAM MELL U
[9]  
Bradner S., 1997, Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels, DOI DOI 10.17487/RFC2119
[10]  
Carver J, 2003, NINTH INTERNATIONAL SOFTWARE METRICS SYMPOSIUM, PROCEEDINGS, P239