Cytogenetic damage in peripheral blood cultures of Chaetophractus villosus exposed in vivo to a glyphosate formulation (Roundup)

被引:10
作者
Francisco Rossi, Luis [1 ,2 ]
Pablo Luaces, Juan [1 ,2 ]
Maria Palermo, Ana [3 ]
Susana Merani, Maria [1 ,2 ]
Dolores Mudry, Marta [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Fac Med, Lab Biol Cromosom, C1121ABG, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, C1425FQB, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Inst Invest Cient & Tecn Def CITEDEF, B1603ALQ, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[4] Univ Buenos Aires, FCEyN, IEGEBA, GIBE,Dept EGE, C1428EGA, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
Genotoxicity; Roundup; Chromosomal aberrations; Sister chromatid exchange; Replication index; BROAD-SNOUTED CAIMAN; BASE-LINE VALUES; COMET ASSAY; VITRO GENOTOXICITY; REPTILE ECOTOXICOLOGY; ISOPROPYLAMINE SALT; SENTINEL ORGANISM; MICRONUCLEUS TEST; LACERTID LIZARD; RISK-ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.046
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Different concentrations of a glyphosate formulation, Roundups (R) Full II (66.2% glyphosate) were tested in culture peripheral blood of armadillo Chaetophractus villosus with cytogenetic biomarkers like mitotic index (MI), chromosomal aberrations (CA), sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and cell proliferation kinetics (CPK) by means of replication index. Adults animals of both sexes were exposed to RU at four concentrations ranging from 0.026 mL RU solution to 0.379 mL RU daily in oral treatment with the same volume (0.2 mL) during 7 days. We analyzed the induced damage at different times considering TO as control value, one (T1), seven (T7) and 30 days (T30). One day after, only the higher concentration shows MI significant differences (p < 0.05), at T7 the frequency increases and at T30 it decreases reaching TO values. The analysis of CA frequencies shows that only 0.106 mL RU/day exhibit significant differences vs TO values. A great variability is expressed in the values of standard deviation (SD) and in the wide confidence intervals of the media. One day after treatments (T1) all four concentrations shows significant differences in SCE vs TO values. Replication Index (RI) does not show significant differences. The dose-response behavior was not observed in either CA or SCE. The consistency of the findings obtained with the same biomarkers in vitro support the idea of expanding studies in order to characterize the risk doses for these mammals.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 127
页数:7
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Comparison of the in vivo and in vitro genotoxicity of glyphosate isopropylamine salt in three different organisms
    Alvarez-Moya, Carlos
    Reynoso Silva, Monica
    Valdez Ramirez, Carlos
    Gomez Gallardo, David
    Leon Sanchez, Rafael
    Canales Aguirre, Alejandro
    Feria Velasco, Alfredo
    [J]. GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2014, 37 (01) : 105 - 110
  • [2] Evaluation of genetic damage induced by glyphosate isopropylamine salt using Tradescantia bioassays
    Alvarez-Moya, Carlos
    Reynoso Silva, Monica
    Villalobos Arambula, Alma Rosa
    Islas Sandoval, Alfonso
    Castaneda Vasquez, Hugo
    Gonzalez Montes, Rosa Maria
    [J]. GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2011, 34 (01) : 127 - 130
  • [3] The use of a lacertid lizard as a model for reptile ecotoxicology studies: Part 2-Biomarkers of exposure and toxicity among pesticide exposed lizards
    Amaral, Maria Jose
    Bicho, Rita C.
    Carretero, Miguel A.
    Sanchez-Hernandez, Juan C.
    Faustino, Augusto M. R.
    Soares, Amadeu M. V. M.
    Mann, Reinier M.
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2012, 87 (07) : 765 - 774
  • [4] The use of a lacertid lizard as a model for reptile ecotoxicology studies - Part 1 Field demographics and morphology
    Amaral, Maria Jose
    Carretero, Miguel A.
    Bicho, Rita C.
    Soares, Amadeu M. V. M.
    Mann, Reinier M.
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2012, 87 (07) : 757 - 764
  • [5] What do sentinels stand for?
    Beeby, A
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2001, 112 (02) : 285 - 298
  • [6] Genotoxic activity of glyphosate and its technical formulation roundup
    Bolognesi, C
    Bonatti, S
    Degan, P
    Gallerani, E
    Peluso, M
    Rabboni, R
    Roggieri, P
    Abbondandolo, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1997, 45 (05) : 1957 - 1962
  • [7] Burlibasa L, 2011, APPL ECOL ENV RES, V9, P1
  • [8] Carrasco A. E., 2012, SAGE BRIEF GUIDE COR, P1
  • [9] Toxicological Responses of Cyprinus carpio Exposed to a Commercial Formulation Containing Glyphosate
    Cattaneo, Roberta
    Clasen, Barbara
    Loro, Vania Lucia
    de Menezes, Charlene Cavalheiro
    Pretto, Alexandra
    Baldisserotto, Bernardo
    Santi, Adriana
    de Avila, Luis Antonio
    [J]. BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2011, 87 (06) : 597 - 602
  • [10] Genotoxic effects of Roundup® on the fish Prochilodus lineatus
    Cavalcante, D. G. S. M.
    Martinez, C. B. R.
    Sofia, S. H.
    [J]. MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2008, 655 (1-2) : 41 - 46