Cost analysis of activated sludge and membrane bioreactor WWTPs using CapdetWorks simulation program: Case study of Tikrit WWTP (middle Iraq)

被引:51
作者
Arif, Alaa Uldeen Athil [1 ]
Sorour, Mohamed Tarek [1 ]
Aly, Samia Ahmed [1 ]
机构
[1] Alexandria Univ, Fac Engn, Sanit Engn Dept, Lotfy El Sied St Off, Alexandria 035910052, Egypt
关键词
Activated sludge; Membrane bioreactor; Wastewater treatment; Economic modeling; Cost analysis; WATER TREATMENT PLANTS; DESIGN; OPERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.aej.2020.08.023
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper aims to display benefits of applying economic modeling to predict the most economic treatment among three wastewater treatment plants containing conventional activated sludge without denitrification (CAS), conventional activated sludge with pre-denitrification (CAS-N), and membrane bioreactor (MBR) using CapdetWorks (v.3) simulation software. The software was run for each alternative with an average flow of 30,000 m(3)/d to calculate and evaluate the current worth costs of these WWTPs. Besides, the price per cubic meter of influent flow of the WWTPs has been evaluated. Tikrit WWTP was selected as a case study. Results demonstrated that the current worth cost of the MBR plant is higher than that for the CAS and CAS-N by about 57%, 42% respectively. Furthermore, the price per cubic meter of influent flow of the CAS plant is 0.2 $/m(3). Dissimilarity, costs of the CAS-N and MBR plants are 0.27 $/m(3) and 0.43 $/m(3) respectively. The low cost of the CAS comes with lower removal efficiencies in comparison to the CAS-N and MBR. Accordingly, the economic modeling is helpful to build and compare relative costs for treatment alternatives which lead to better engineering decisions and suitable selection of the appropriate treatment based on either cost or effluent quality. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University.
引用
收藏
页码:4659 / 4667
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[31]   Application of cost criteria for selection of municipal wastewater treatment systems [J].
Tsagarakis, KP ;
Mara, DD ;
Angelakis, AN .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2003, 142 (1-4) :187-210
[32]   Integration of wastewater treatment plant design and operation - A systematic approach using cost functions [J].
Vanrolleghem, PA ;
Jeppsson, U ;
Carstensen, J ;
Carlsson, B ;
Olsson, G .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 34 (3-4) :159-171
[33]   The cost of a large-scale hollow fibre MBR [J].
Verrecht, Bart ;
Maere, Thomas ;
Nopens, Ingmar ;
Brepols, Christoph ;
Judd, Simon .
WATER RESEARCH, 2010, 44 (18) :5274-5283
[34]   State-of-the-art of membrane bioreactors: Worldwide research and commercial applications in North America [J].
Yang, WB ;
Cicek, N ;
Ilg, J .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 270 (1-2) :201-211
[35]  
Zaerpour M., 2014, THESIS
[36]  
Zahid W.M., 2007, P 7 SAUD ENG C, P2
[37]  
Zioui D., 2015, UNIT MEMBRANE TECHNO