Cost analysis of activated sludge and membrane bioreactor WWTPs using CapdetWorks simulation program: Case study of Tikrit WWTP (middle Iraq)

被引:51
作者
Arif, Alaa Uldeen Athil [1 ]
Sorour, Mohamed Tarek [1 ]
Aly, Samia Ahmed [1 ]
机构
[1] Alexandria Univ, Fac Engn, Sanit Engn Dept, Lotfy El Sied St Off, Alexandria 035910052, Egypt
关键词
Activated sludge; Membrane bioreactor; Wastewater treatment; Economic modeling; Cost analysis; WATER TREATMENT PLANTS; DESIGN; OPERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.aej.2020.08.023
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper aims to display benefits of applying economic modeling to predict the most economic treatment among three wastewater treatment plants containing conventional activated sludge without denitrification (CAS), conventional activated sludge with pre-denitrification (CAS-N), and membrane bioreactor (MBR) using CapdetWorks (v.3) simulation software. The software was run for each alternative with an average flow of 30,000 m(3)/d to calculate and evaluate the current worth costs of these WWTPs. Besides, the price per cubic meter of influent flow of the WWTPs has been evaluated. Tikrit WWTP was selected as a case study. Results demonstrated that the current worth cost of the MBR plant is higher than that for the CAS and CAS-N by about 57%, 42% respectively. Furthermore, the price per cubic meter of influent flow of the CAS plant is 0.2 $/m(3). Dissimilarity, costs of the CAS-N and MBR plants are 0.27 $/m(3) and 0.43 $/m(3) respectively. The low cost of the CAS comes with lower removal efficiencies in comparison to the CAS-N and MBR. Accordingly, the economic modeling is helpful to build and compare relative costs for treatment alternatives which lead to better engineering decisions and suitable selection of the appropriate treatment based on either cost or effluent quality. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University.
引用
收藏
页码:4659 / 4667
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Ahmadi M., 2004, TECHNICAL EC EXAMINA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, COST PERFORMANCE COM
[3]  
Arif A. U. A., 2018, Journal of Environmental Protection, V9, P636, DOI 10.4236/jep.2018.96040
[4]  
Arif A.U.A., 2018, THESIS
[5]  
Aybar M., 2012, Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, V201210, P5458
[6]   Modeling of Wastewater Treatment Processes in Membrane Bioreactors Compared to Conventional Activated Sludge Systems [J].
Bis, Marta ;
Montusiewicz, Agnieszka ;
Piotrowicz, Adam ;
Lagod, Grzegorz .
PROCESSES, 2019, 7 (05)
[7]   A balancing act: the consulting engineers' pragmatic view of process modelling [J].
Copp, J. B. ;
Johnson, B. R. ;
Shaw, A. ;
Burbano, M. S. ;
Narayanan, B. ;
Frank, K. ;
Kinnear, D. ;
Melcer, H. ;
Brischke, K. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 59 (04) :763-769
[8]   EVALUATION AND DESIGN OF FULL-SCALE WASTE-WATER TREATMENT PLANTS USING BIOLOGICAL PROCESS MODELS [J].
DAIGGER, GT ;
NOLASCO, D .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 31 (02) :245-255
[9]   Effects of design flow and treatment level on construction and operation costs of municipal wastewater treatment plants and their implications on policy making [J].
Friedler, Eran ;
Pisanty, Ehud .
WATER RESEARCH, 2006, 40 (20) :3751-3758
[10]   Activated sludge wastewater treatment plant modelling and simulation: state of the art [J].
Gernaey, KV ;
van Loosdrecht, MCM ;
Henze, M ;
Lind, M ;
Jorgensen, SB .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2004, 19 (09) :763-783