China's electric vehicle subsidy scheme: Rationale and impacts

被引:211
作者
Hao, Han [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Ou, Xunmin [2 ,3 ]
Du, Jiuyu [1 ,3 ]
Wang, Hewu [1 ,3 ]
Ouyang, Minggao [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, State Key Lab Automot Safety & Energy, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Energy Environm & Econ 3E, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, China Automot Energy Res Ctr, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chicago, Energy Policy Inst Chicago, Chicago, IL 60616 USA
关键词
Electric vehicle; Passenger vehicle; China; Subsidy; Ownership cost; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; PLUG-IN HYBRID; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; FUEL; POLICIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.022
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To promote the market penetration of electric vehicles (EV), China launched the Electric Vehicle Subsidy Scheme (EVSS) in Jan 2009, followed by an update in Sep 2013, which we named phase I and phase II EVSS, respectively. In this paper, we presented the rationale of China's two-phase EVSS and estimated their impacts on EV market penetration, with a focus on the ownership cost analysis of battery electric passenger vehicles (BEPV). Based on the ownership cost comparison of five defining BEPV models and their counterpart conventional passenger vehicle (CPV) models, we concluded that in the short term, especially before 2015, China's EVSS is very necessary for BEPVs to be cost competitive compared with CPVs. The transition from phase Ito phase II EVSS will generally reduce subsidy intensity, thus resulting in temporary rise of BEPV ownership cost. However, with the decrease of BEPV manufacturing cost, the ownership cost of BEPV is projected to decrease despite of the phase-out mechanism under phase II EVSS. In the mid term of around 2015-2020, BEPV could become less or not reliant on subsidy to maintain cost competitiveness. However, given the performance disadvantages of BEPV, especially the limited electric range, China's current EVSS is not sufficient for the BEPV market to take off. Technology improvement associated with battery cost reduction has to play an essential role in starting up China's BEPV market. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 732
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Review of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicle market modeling Studies [J].
Al-Alawi, Baha M. ;
Bradley, Thomas H. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 21 :190-203
[2]   An approach to energy savings and improved environmental impact through restructuring Jordan's transport sector [J].
Al-Ghandoor, A. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 18 :31-42
[3]   Projection of future transport energy demand of Jordan using adaptive neuro-fuzzy technique [J].
Al-Ghandoor, Ahmed ;
Samhouri, Murad ;
Al-Hinti, Ismael ;
Jaber, Jamal ;
Al-Rawashdeh, Mohammad .
ENERGY, 2012, 38 (01) :128-135
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion Highlights
[5]  
Burke A., 2012, ENERGY SAVING COST P
[6]  
China Vehicle Technology Service Center, 2009, OUTL TEST MAX EL POW
[7]  
Davis S., 2013, Transportation Energy Data Book, P32
[8]   An agent-based model to study market penetration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles [J].
Eppstein, Margaret J. ;
Grover, David K. ;
Marshall, Jeffrey S. ;
Rizzo, Donna M. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (06) :3789-3802
[9]   Co-benefit evaluation for urban public transportation sector a case of Shenyang, China [J].
Geng, Yong ;
Ma, Zhixiao ;
Xue, Bing ;
Ren, Wanxia ;
Liu, Zhe ;
Fujita, Tsuyoshi .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 58 :82-91
[10]  
Greene D.L., 2001, TAFV ALTERNATIVE FUELS AND VEHICLES CHOICE MODEL DOCUMENTATION