Screw Fixation Compared with Suture-Button Fixation of Isolated Lisfranc Ligament Injuries

被引:89
作者
Panchbhavi, Vinod K. [1 ]
Vallurupalli, Santaram [1 ]
Yang, Jinping [1 ]
Andersen, Clark R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Rehabil, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
关键词
JOINT INJURIES; INTERNAL-FIXATION; OPEN REDUCTION; STABILIZATION; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.H.00162
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A cannulated screw is currently used to reduce and stabilize diastasis at the Lisfranc joint. The screw requires removal and may break in situ. A suture button does not have these disadvantages, but it is not known if it can provide stability similar to that provided by a cannulated screw or an intact Lisfranc ligament. The objective of the present study was to compare the stability provided by a suture button with that provided by a screw when used to stabilize the diastasis associated with Lisfranc ligament injury. Methods: Fourteen fresh-frozen, paired cadaveric feet were dissected to expose the dorsal region. A registration marker triad consisting of three screws was fixed to the first cuneiform and the second metatarsal. A digitizer was utilized to record the three-dimensional positions of the registration markers and their displacement in test conditions before and after cutting of the Lisfranc ligament and after stabilization of the joint with either a suture button or a cannulated screw. The first and second cuneiforms and their metatarsals were removed, and the ligament attachment sites were digitized. Displacement at the Lisfranc ligament and the three-dimensional positions of the bones were determined. Results: Loading with the Lisfranc ligament cut resulted in displacement that was significantly different from that after screw fixation (p = 0.0001), with a difference between means of 1.2 mm. Likewise, loading with the Lisfranc ligament cut resulted in a displacement that was significantly different from that after suture-button fixation (p = 0.0008), with a difference between means of 1.00 mm. No significant difference in displacement was found between specimens fixed with the suture button and those fixed with the screw. Conclusions: Suture-button fixation can provide stability similar to that provided by screw fixation in cadaver specimens after isolated transection of the Lisfranc ligament. Clinical Relevance: Fixation with a suture button may be an acceptable alternative to screw fixation in the treatment of isolated Lisfranc ligament injuries, avoiding subsequent surgery to remove the hardware prior to weight-bearing.
引用
收藏
页码:1143 / 1148
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcomes After Percutaneous Reduction and Fixation of Low-Energy Lisfranc Injuries
    Vosbikian, Michael
    O'Neil, Joseph T.
    Piper, Christine
    Huang, Ronald
    Raikin, Steven M.
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 38 (07) : 710 - 715
  • [32] Arthrodesis or Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Lisfranc Injuries: A Meta-analysis
    Levy, Christopher J.
    Yatsonsky, David, II
    Moral, Muhammad Z.
    Liu, Jiayong
    Ebraheim, Nabil A.
    FOOT & ANKLE SPECIALIST, 2022, 15 (02) : 179 - 184
  • [33] Temporary Internal Fixation for Ligamentous and Osseous Lisfranc Injuries: Outcome and Technical Tip
    Abbasian, Mohammad Reza
    Paradies, Felix
    Weber, Martin
    Krause, Fabian
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 36 (08) : 976 - 983
  • [34] Biomechanical performance of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of interference screw fixation, cortical button fixation, and interference screw diameter
    Sethi, Paul M.
    Rajaram, Arun
    Beitzel, Knut
    Hackett, Thomas R.
    Chowaniec, David M.
    Mazzocca, Augustus D.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2013, 22 (04) : 451 - 457
  • [35] Shortening the Return-to-Play Times in Elite Athletes With Unstable Isolated Lisfranc Ligament Injuries Using a Knotless Interosseous Suture Button: Case Series and Literature Review
    Sullivan, Martin
    Peckston, Dane
    Alpuerto, Bernardino, II
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (06)
  • [36] Trapeziectomy with suture-button suspensionplasty versus ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition: a randomized controlled trial
    Morais, Bruno
    Botelho, Tiago
    Marques, Nuno
    Nobrega, Joao
    Ferrao, Ana
    Jorge, Joao
    Teixeira, Frederico
    HAND SURGERY & REHABILITATION, 2022, 41 (01) : 59 - 64
  • [37] Comparison of spinopelvic fixation and iliosacral screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injuries
    Demir, Ekin Baris
    Barca, Fatih
    Havitcioglu, Cagri
    Atilla, Halis Atil
    Akdogan, Mutlu
    ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2025, 31 (01): : 75 - 83
  • [38] Posterior screw fixation in rotationally unstable pelvic ring injuries
    Osterhoff, Georg
    Ossendorf, Christian
    Wanner, Guido A.
    Simmen, Hans-Peter
    Werner, Clement M. L.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2011, 42 (10): : 992 - 996
  • [39] Surgical management of Rockwood type 3 acromioclavicular joint injuries: a retrospective comparison of outcomes of suture anchor fixation and double-button fixation techniques
    Topal, Murat
    Kose, Ahmet
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (21) : E20312
  • [40] Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Primary Arthrodesis for Lisfranc Injuries
    Weatherford, Brian M.
    Bohay, Donald R.
    Anderson, John G.
    FOOT AND ANKLE CLINICS, 2017, 22 (01) : 1 - +