Screw Fixation Compared with Suture-Button Fixation of Isolated Lisfranc Ligament Injuries

被引:90
|
作者
Panchbhavi, Vinod K. [1 ]
Vallurupalli, Santaram [1 ]
Yang, Jinping [1 ]
Andersen, Clark R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Rehabil, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
关键词
JOINT INJURIES; INTERNAL-FIXATION; OPEN REDUCTION; STABILIZATION; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.H.00162
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A cannulated screw is currently used to reduce and stabilize diastasis at the Lisfranc joint. The screw requires removal and may break in situ. A suture button does not have these disadvantages, but it is not known if it can provide stability similar to that provided by a cannulated screw or an intact Lisfranc ligament. The objective of the present study was to compare the stability provided by a suture button with that provided by a screw when used to stabilize the diastasis associated with Lisfranc ligament injury. Methods: Fourteen fresh-frozen, paired cadaveric feet were dissected to expose the dorsal region. A registration marker triad consisting of three screws was fixed to the first cuneiform and the second metatarsal. A digitizer was utilized to record the three-dimensional positions of the registration markers and their displacement in test conditions before and after cutting of the Lisfranc ligament and after stabilization of the joint with either a suture button or a cannulated screw. The first and second cuneiforms and their metatarsals were removed, and the ligament attachment sites were digitized. Displacement at the Lisfranc ligament and the three-dimensional positions of the bones were determined. Results: Loading with the Lisfranc ligament cut resulted in displacement that was significantly different from that after screw fixation (p = 0.0001), with a difference between means of 1.2 mm. Likewise, loading with the Lisfranc ligament cut resulted in a displacement that was significantly different from that after suture-button fixation (p = 0.0008), with a difference between means of 1.00 mm. No significant difference in displacement was found between specimens fixed with the suture button and those fixed with the screw. Conclusions: Suture-button fixation can provide stability similar to that provided by screw fixation in cadaver specimens after isolated transection of the Lisfranc ligament. Clinical Relevance: Fixation with a suture button may be an acceptable alternative to screw fixation in the treatment of isolated Lisfranc ligament injuries, avoiding subsequent surgery to remove the hardware prior to weight-bearing.
引用
收藏
页码:1143 / 1148
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Suture Button vs Conventional Screw Fixation for Isolated Lisfranc Ligament Injuries
    Cho, Jaeho
    Kim, Jahyung
    Min, Tae-Hong
    Chun, Dong-Il
    Won, Sung Hun
    Park, Suyeon
    Yi, Young
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 42 (05) : 598 - 608
  • [2] Comparison of Standard Screw Fixation Versus Suture Button Fixation in Lisfranc Ligament Injuries
    Ahmed, Sonya
    Bolt, Becky
    McBryde, Angus
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 31 (10) : 892 - 896
  • [3] A Comparison of Screw Fixation and Suture-Button Fixation in a Syndesmosis Injury in an Ankle Fracture
    Kim, Jung-Han
    Gwak, Heui-Chul
    Lee, Chang-Rack
    Choo, Hye-Jeung
    Kim, Jeon-Gyo
    Kim, Dae-Yoo
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2016, 55 (05) : 985 - 990
  • [4] Strength of suture-button fixation versus ligament reconstruction in syndesmotic injury: a biomechanical study
    Li, Hong-Yun
    Zhou, Ru-Shou
    Wu, Zi-Ying
    Zhao, Yutong
    Chen, Shi-Yi
    Hua, Ying-Hui
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2019, 43 (03) : 705 - 711
  • [5] The Use of Knotless Suture Tape Construct vs Screw Fixation for Lisfranc Injuries: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study
    Cardenas, Cesar
    Mciver, Natalia D.
    Nelson, Jessica
    Ahmad, Aamir
    Chavez, Tyler
    Gross, Jessica
    Salas, Christina
    Gavin, Katherine
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 45 (08) : 896 - 904
  • [6] Suture button fixation yields high levels of patient reported outcomes, return to sport, and stable fixation in isolated Lisfranc injuries: A systematic review
    Lachance, Andrew D.
    Giro, Margaret Elizabeth
    Edelstein, Alexander
    Lee, Wonyong
    JOURNAL OF ISAKOS JOINT DISORDERS & ORTHOPAEDIC SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 8 (06) : 474 - 483
  • [7] Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Syndesmotic Plate Compared With Traditional Screw and Suture Button Fixation
    Weng, Qihao
    Lin, Chuanlu
    Liu, Yang
    Dai, Gaole
    Lutchooman, Vinesh
    Hong, Jianjun
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2020, 59 (03) : 522 - 528
  • [8] OUTCOME COMPARISON OF LISFRANC INJURIES TREATED THROUGH DORSAL PLATE FIXATION VERSUS SCREW FIXATION
    Hu, Sun-jun
    Chang, Shi-min
    Li, Xiao-hua
    Yu, Guang-rong
    ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2014, 22 (06): : 315 - 320
  • [9] Various Flexible Fixation Techniques Using Suture Button for Ligamentous Lisfranc Injuries: A Review of Surgical Options
    Yi, Young
    Chaudhari, Sagar
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (06):
  • [10] Randomized, Prospective Comparison of Bioabsorbable and Steel Screw Fixation of Lisfranc Injuries
    Ahmad, Jamal
    Jones, Kennis
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2016, 30 (12) : 676 - 681