Membrane Gas-Solvent Contactor Pilot Plant Trials of CO2 Absorption from Flue Gas

被引:50
作者
Scholes, Colin A. [1 ]
Qader, Abdul [1 ]
Stevens, Geoff W. [1 ]
Kentish, Sandra E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Cooperat Res Ctr Greenhouse Gas Technol CO2CRC, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
non-porous; membrane contactor; flue gas; pilot plant; porous; CARBON-DIOXIDE ABSORPTION; HOLLOW-FIBER MEMBRANES; MASS-TRANSFER; POTASSIUM GLYCINATE; AQUEOUS-SOLUTIONS; PERFORMANCE; REMOVAL; CAPTURE; SEPARATION; MODULES;
D O I
10.1080/01496395.2014.937499
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Membrane gas-solvent contactors have received much attention for CO2 absorption, as the approach incorporates advantages from both solvent absorption and membrane gas separation. This study reports on pilot plant trials of three membrane contactors for the separation of CO2 from flue gas. The contactors were porous polypropylene (PP), porous polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), and non-porous polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), with the solvent PuraTreatTM F-TM. To enable performance comparison, laboratory measurements based on a gas mixture of 10% CO2 in N-2 were also undertaken on the same contactor-solvent systems. It was found that the PP contactor experienced significant pore wetting in both laboratory and pilot plant studies. In contrast, the PTFE contactor experienced only minor pore wetting in the laboratory. However, in the pilot plant trial of the PTFE contactor extensive pore wetting was observed, and the overall mass transfer coefficient measured was comparable with the PP contactor. The non-porous PDMS contactor had an overall mass transfer coefficient two orders of magnitude less than the PP contactor, due to the greater mass transfer resistance of the polymeric film. However, the non-porous membrane does not experience pore wetting, which resulted in the overall mass transfer coefficient being similar for both laboratory and pilot plant measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:2449 / 2458
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   A comparison of porous and non-porous gas-liquid membrane contactors for gas separation [J].
AlSaffar, HB ;
Ozturk, B ;
Hughes, R .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 1997, 75 (A7) :685-692
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, BASF COMPLETE SOLUTI
[3]  
[Anonymous], OFFICIAL METHODS ANA
[4]   Membrane Contactors for Postcombustion Carbon Dioxide Capture: A Comparative Study of Wetting Resistance on Long Time Scales [J].
Chabanon, Elodie ;
Roizard, Denis ;
Favre, Eric .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2011, 50 (13) :8237-8244
[5]   Analysis on a hydrophobic hollow-fiber membrane absorber and experimental observations of CO2 removal by enhanced absorption [J].
Chun, MS ;
Lee, KH .
SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 32 (15) :2445-2466
[6]   THE EFFECT OF SHELL SIDE HYDRODYNAMICS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF AXIAL-FLOW HOLLOW-FIBER MODULES [J].
COSTELLO, MJ ;
FANE, AG ;
HOGAN, PA ;
SCHOFIELD, RW .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1993, 80 (1-3) :1-11
[7]   Using polypropylene and polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in a membrane contactor for CO2 absorption [J].
deMontigny, David ;
Tontiwachwuthikul, Paitoon ;
Chakma, Amit .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 277 (1-2) :99-107
[8]  
Energy U. D. o., 2003, DOE NETL ADV CO2 CAP
[9]   CO2 capture with membrane contactors [J].
Falk-Pedersen, O ;
Gronvold, MS ;
Nokleby, P ;
Bjerve, F ;
Svendsen, HF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREEN ENERGY, 2005, 2 (02) :157-165
[10]   CO2 separation with polyolefin membrane contactors and dedicated absorption liquids:: performances and prospects [J].
Feron, PHM ;
Jansen, AE .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 27 (03) :231-242