Four system boundaries for carbon accounts

被引:55
作者
Liu, Zhu [1 ]
Feng, Kuishuang [2 ]
Hubacek, Klaus [2 ]
Liang, Sai [3 ]
Anadon, Laura Diaz [1 ]
Zhang, Chao [4 ]
Guan, Dabo [5 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, John F Kennedy Sch Govt, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Geog Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Tongji Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[5] Univ E Anglia, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change Res, Sch Int Dev, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Carbon emissions; Carbon footprint; Consumption-based emission; Multi-regional input-output analysis; Embodied emissions; China; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSION; INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS; CO2; CITIES; CONSUMPTION; FOOTPRINT; TRADE; GOVERNANCE; SHANGHAI; TIANJIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.02.001
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Knowing the carbon emission baseline of a region is a precondition for any mitigation effort, but the baselines are highly dependent on the system boundaries for which they are calculated. On the basis of sectoral energy statistics and a nested provincial and global multi-regional input output model, we calculate and compare four different system boundaries for China's 30 provinces and major cities. The results demonstrate significant differences in the level of emissions for the different system boundaries. Moreover, the associated emissions with each system boundary varies with the regional development level, i.e. richer areas outsource more emissions to other areas, or in other words boundary 4 emissions are higher than boundary 1 emissions for rich areas and vice versa for poor areas. Given these significant differences it is important to be aware of the implications the choice of an accounting system might have on outcomes. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 125
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条