Non-invasive prenatal testing to detect chromosome aneuploidies in 57,204 pregnancies

被引:34
|
作者
Xue, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Guodong [3 ]
Li, Hong [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Qin [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Jiafeng [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Bin [4 ]
Wang, Ting [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Suzhou Hosp, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Suzhou Municipal Hosp, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Kunshan Innovat Inst, Kunshan Biotechnol Lab, Kunshan 215300, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Med Univ, Changzhou Matern & Child Hlth Care Hosp, Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
NIPT; Chromosome aneuploidies; Next generation sequencing; Performance; FETAL ANEUPLOIDIES; MATERNAL PLASMA; DNA;
D O I
10.1186/s13039-019-0441-5
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
BackgroundNon-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been widely used to detect common fetal chromosome aneuploidies, such as trisomy 13, 18, and 21 (T13, T18, and T21), and has expanded to sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) during recent years, but few studies have reported NIPT detection of rare fetal chromosome aneuploidies (RCAs). In this study, we evaluated the clinical practical performance of NIPT to analyze all 24 chromosome aneuploidies among 57,204 pregnancies in the Suzhou area of China.MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected NIPT data from two next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms (Illumina and Proton) obtained from The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. NIPT results were validated by karyotyping or clinical follow-up.ResultsNIPT using the Illumina platform identified 586 positive cases; fetal karyotyping and follow-up results validated 178T21 cases, 49T18 cases, 4T13 cases, and 52 SCAs. On the Proton platform, 270 cases were positive during NIPT. Follow-up confirmed 85T21 cases, 17T18 cases, 4T13 cases, 28 SCAs, and 1 fetal chromosome 22 aneuploidy case as true positives. There were 5 false-negative results, including 4T21 and 1T18 cases. The NGS platforms showed similar sensitivities and positive predictive values (PPVs) in detecting T21, T18, T13 and SCAs (p>0.01). However, the Proton platform showed better specificity in detecting 45, X and the Illumina platform had better specificity in detecting T13 (p<0.01). The major factor contributing to NIPT false-positives on the Illumina platform was false SCAs cases (65.11%). Maternal chromosome aneuploidies, maternal cancers, and confined placental mosaicism caused discordant results between fetal karyotyping and NIPT.ConclusionNIPT with NGS showed good performance for detecting T13, T18, and T21. The Proton platform had better performance for detecting SCAs, but the NIPT accuracy rate for detecting RCAs was insufficient.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Update in non-invasive prenatal testing
    D'Ambrosio, Valentina
    Squarcella, Antonia
    Vena, Flaminia
    Di Mascio, Daniele
    Corno, Sara
    Pajno, Cristina
    Piccioni, Maria G.
    Brunelli, Roberto
    Pizzuti, Antonio
    Benedetti Panici, Pierluigi
    Giancotti, Antonella
    MINERVA GINECOLOGICA, 2019, 71 (01): : 44 - 53
  • [22] Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in Germany
    Liehr, Thomas
    Harutyunyan, Tigran
    Williams, Heather
    Weise, Anja
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (11)
  • [23] The efficacy of expanded non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in a high-risk twin pregnancies cohort
    Meng, Meng
    Chen, Jianping
    Yang, Yingjun
    Zhang, Yun
    Zou, Gang
    Zhou, Fenhe
    Wei, Xing
    Ge, Yuchun
    Zhou, Jia
    Sun, Luming
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2024, 103 (12) : 2426 - 2432
  • [24] Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidies: new technologies and clinical applications
    Papageorgiou, Elisavet A.
    Patsalis, Philippos C.
    GENOME MEDICINE, 2012, 4
  • [25] Calculation of Fetal Fraction for Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing
    Cserhati, Matthew
    BIOTECH, 2021, 10 (03):
  • [26] Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): Reliability, Challenges, and Future Directions
    Jayashankar, Siva Shantini
    Nasaruddin, Muhammad Luqman
    Hassan, Muhammad Faiz
    Dasrilsyah, Rima Anggrena
    Shafiee, Mohamad Nasir
    Ismail, Noor Akmal Shareela
    Alias, Ekram
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (15)
  • [27] A new era in prenatal care: non-invasive prenatal testing in Switzerland
    Manegold-Brauer, Gwendolin
    Bellin, Anjeung Kang
    Hahn, Sinuhe
    De Geyter, Christian
    Buechel, Johanna
    Hoesli, Irene
    Lapaire, Olav
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2014, 144
  • [28] Current status of non-invasive prenatal testing in Japan
    Samura, Osamu
    Sekizawa, Akihiko
    Suzumori, Nobuhiro
    Sasaki, Aiko
    Wada, Seiji
    Hamanoue, Haruka
    Hirahara, Fumiki
    Sawai, Hideaki
    Nakamura, Hiroaki
    Yamada, Takahiro
    Miura, Kiyonori
    Masuzaki, Hideaki
    Nakayama, Setsuko
    Okai, Takashi
    Kamei, Yoshimasa
    Namba, Akira
    Murotsuki, Jun
    Tanemoto, Tomohiro
    Fukushima, Akimune
    Haino, Kazufumi
    Tairaku, Shinya
    Matsubara, Keiichi
    Maeda, Kazuhisa
    Kaji, Takashi
    Ogawa, Masanobu
    Osada, Hisao
    Nishizawa, Haruki
    Okamoto, Yoko
    Kanagawa, Takeshi
    Kakigano, Aiko
    Kitagawa, Michihiro
    Ogawa, Masaki
    Izumi, Shunichiro
    Katagiri, Yukiko
    Takeshita, Naoki
    Kasai, Yasuyo
    Naruse, Katsuhiko
    Neki, Reiko
    Masuyama, Hisashi
    Hyodo, Maki
    Kawano, Yukie
    Ohba, Takashi
    Ichizuka, Kiyotake
    Kido, Yasuhiro
    Fukao, Toshiyuki
    Miharu, Norio
    Nagamatsu, Takeshi
    Watanabe, Atsushi
    Hamajima, Naoki
    Hirose, Masaya
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2017, 43 (08) : 1245 - 1255
  • [29] Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidies: new technologies and clinical applications
    Elisavet A Papageorgiou
    Philippos C Patsalis
    Genome Medicine, 4
  • [30] Whole genome non-invasive prenatal testing in prenatal screening algorithm: clinical experience from 12,700 pregnancies
    Baranova, Elena E.
    Sagaydak, Olesya, V
    Galaktionova, Alexandra M.
    Kuznetsova, Ekaterina S.
    Kaplanova, Madina T.
    Makarova, Maria, V
    Belenikin, Maxim S.
    Olenev, Anton S.
    Songolova, Ekaterina N.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2022, 22 (01)