RISK OF SEVERE AND REFRACTORY POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING DIEP FLAP BREAST RECONSTRUCTION

被引:18
作者
Manahan, Michele A. [1 ]
Basdag, Basak [1 ,2 ]
Kalmar, Christopher L. [1 ]
Shridharani, Sachin M. [1 ]
Magarakis, Michael [1 ]
Jacobs, Lisa K. [3 ]
Thomsen, Robert W. [4 ]
Rosson, Gedge D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Ctr Surg Trials & Outcomes Res, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Div Surg Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
关键词
DOUBLE-BLIND; ANTIEMETIC PROPHYLAXIS; POSTDISCHARGE NAUSEA; NITROUS OXIDE; PREVENTION; PROPOFOL; ANESTHESIA; ONDANSETRON; EFFICACY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1002/micr.22155
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPostoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are commonly feared after general anesthesia and can impact results. The primary aim of our study was to examine incidence and severity of PONV by investigating complete response, or absence of PONV, to prophylaxis used in patients undergoing DIEP flaps. Our secondary aims were definition of the magnitude of risk, state of the art of interventions, clinical sequelae of PONV, and interaction between these variables, specifically for DIEP patients. MethodsA retrospective chart review occurred for 29 patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction from September 2007 to February 2008. We assessed known patient and procedure-specific risks for PONV after DIEPs, prophylactic antiemetic regimens, incidence, and severity of PONV, postoperative antiemetic rescues, and effects of risks and treatments on symptoms. ResultsThree or more established risks existed in all patients, with up to seven risks per patient. Although 90% of patients received diverse prophylaxis, 76% of patients experienced PONV, and 66% experienced its severe form, emesis. Early PONV (73%) was frequent; symptoms were long lasting (average 20 hours for nausea and emesis); and multiple rescue medications were frequently required (55% for nausea, 58% for emesis). Length of surgery and nonsmoking statistically significantly impacted PONV. ConclusionWe identify previously undocumented high risks for PONV in DIEP patients. High frequency, severity, and refractoriness of PONV occur despite standard prophylaxis. Plastic surgeons and anesthesiologists should further investigate methods to optimize PONV prophylaxis and treatment in DIEP flap patients. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 34:112-121, 2014.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 121
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[31]   POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING - ITS ETIOLOGY, TREATMENT, AND PREVENTION [J].
WATCHA, MF ;
WHITE, PF .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 77 (01) :162-184
[32]   The impact of current antiemetic practices on patient outcomes: A prospective study on high-risk patients [J].
White, Paul F. ;
O'Hara, Jerome F. ;
Roberson, Charles R. ;
Wender, Ronald H. ;
Candiotti, Keith A. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 107 (02) :452-458
[33]   Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting - A multimodal solution to a persistent problem [J].
White, PF .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (24) :2511-2512