Mapping the SF-12 to the EuroQol EQ-5D index in a national US sample

被引:100
作者
Franks, P
Lubetkin, EI
Gold, MR
Tancredi, DJ
Jia, HM
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Ctr Hlth Serv Res Primary Care, Dept Family & Community Med, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[2] CUNY, Sch Med, Dept Community Hlth & Social Med, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
health status; SF-12; EQ-5D;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X04265477
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Preference scores for the Medical Outcomes Study(MOS) SF-12 would enable its use in cost-effectiveness analyses. Previous mopping studies of MOS instruments to preference-based instruments have not examined performance in national samples. Participants. 15,000 adults in the 2000 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey annual survey including the SF-12 and EQ-5D Index. Methods. Regression of the EQ-5D Index scores onto the physical and mental component summary scores of the SF-12, testing 2nd-4th degree polynomial and spline models, including and excluding sociodemographics. Results, A 2nd degree polynomial model explained 63% of the variance in EQ-5D scores, with robust internal and external validation. More complex models explained minimally additional variance. Compared with EQ-5D valuations, prediction models overestimated the lowest health states (6% of the poplulation). Conclusions. The mapped SF-12 yields usable preference-scaled scores, with some caution for the lowest health states.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 254
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 [J].
Brazier, J ;
Roberts, J ;
Deverill, M .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 21 (02) :271-292
[2]   TESTING THE VALIDITY OF THE EUROQOL AND COMPARING IT WITH THE SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
BRAZIER, J ;
JONES, N ;
KIND, P .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1993, 2 (03) :169-180
[3]   Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states [J].
Dolan, P .
MEDICAL CARE, 1997, 35 (11) :1095-1108
[4]   Modelling valuations for EQ-5D health states - An alternative model using differences in valuations [J].
Dolan, P ;
Roberts, J .
MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (05) :442-446
[5]  
Efron B., 1994, INTRO BOOTSTRAP, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429246593
[6]   Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system [J].
Feeny, D ;
Furlong, W ;
Torrance, GW ;
Goldsmith, CH ;
Zhu, ZL ;
DePauw, S ;
Denton, M ;
Boyle, M .
MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (02) :113-128
[7]   Mapping the SF-12 to preference-based instruments - Convergent validity in a low-income, minority population [J].
Franks, P ;
Lubetkin, EI ;
Gold, MR ;
Tancredi, DJ .
MEDICAL CARE, 2003, 41 (11) :1277-1283
[8]   Predicting quality of well-being scores from the SF-36: Results from the Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study [J].
Fryback, DG ;
Lawrence, WF ;
Martin, PA ;
Klein, R ;
Klein, BEK .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1997, 17 (01) :1-9
[9]   Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: Results from the IQOLA Project [J].
Gandek, B ;
Ware, JE ;
Aaronson, NK ;
Apolone, G ;
Bjorner, JB ;
Brazier, JE ;
Bullinger, M ;
Kaasa, S ;
Leplege, A ;
Prieto, L ;
Sullivan, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) :1171-1178
[10]   Assessing the health of the nation - The predictive validity of a preference-based measure and self-rated health [J].
Gold, M ;
Franks, P ;
Erickson, P .
MEDICAL CARE, 1996, 34 (02) :163-177