Psychological distress related to BRCA testing in ovarian cancer patients

被引:24
|
作者
Bjornslett, Merete [1 ,2 ]
Dahl, Alv A. [2 ,3 ]
Sorebo, Oystein [4 ]
Dorum, Anne [5 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Univ Hosp, Norwegian Radium Hosp, Inst Canc Res, Dept Mol Oncol, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Norwegian Radium Hosp, Natl Advisory Ctr Late Effects Canc Treatment, Dept Oncol, Oslo, Norway
[4] Buskerud & Vestfold Univ Coll, Sch Business & Social Sci, Honefoss, Norway
[5] Oslo Univ Hosp, Norwegian Radium Hosp, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Ovarian cancer; Oncology; BRCA; MICRA; Anxiety; HEREDITARY BREAST; DEPRESSION SCALE; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; RISK; QUESTIONNAIRE; MUTATIONS; DESIGN; IMPACT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s10689-015-9811-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
An increasing demand for genetic testing has moved the procedure from highly selected at-risk individuals, now also including cancer patients for treatment associated testing. The heritable fraction of ovarian cancer is more than 10 %, and our department has offered BRCA testing to such patients irrespective of family history since 2002. This study examined potential psychosocial distress associated with this procedure using The Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire and other patient-rated generic distress instruments. Patients were divided into four groups according to cancer risk: mutation carriers, own history of breast cancer and ovarian cancer, family history of breast cancer and/or ovarian cancer, and patients without family history. In a postal survey, 354 patients responded. Good acceptance of the MICRA was observed, and previously described good psychometric properties were confirmed. A significant association between MICRA total score and receiving a positive BRCA test result was found. No significant between-group differences were observed with generic distress instruments. Time since cancer diagnosis, test result, and survey showed no significant associations with MICRA scores. Internal consistencies of instruments were adequate. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses showed adequate fit indices for a three factor solution of the MICRA, but further refinement of the items should be considered. In conclusion, the specific types of worry and distress most relevant to receiving genetic testing irrespective of family history were not captured by the generic distress instruments. The MICRA was supported as a useful tool for detection of mental distress related to genetic testing and risk evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 504
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Guidance Statement On BRCA1/2 Tumor Testing in Ovarian Cancer Patients
    Capoluongo, Ettore
    Ellison, Gillian
    Antonio Lopez-Guerrero, Jose
    Penault-Llorca, Frederique
    Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L.
    Banerjee, Susana
    Singer, Christian
    Friedman, Eitan
    Markiefka, Birgid
    Schirmacher, Peter
    Buttner, Reinhard
    van Asperen, Christi J.
    Ray-Coquard, Isabelle
    Endris, Volker
    Kamel-Reid, Suzanne
    Percival, Natalie
    Bryce, Jane
    Rothlisberger, Benno
    Soong, Richie
    de Castro, David Gonzalez
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2017, 44 (03) : 187 - 197
  • [12] Risk Perception and Psychological Distress in Genetic Counselling for Hereditary Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer
    Cicero, G.
    De Luca, R.
    Dorangricchia, P.
    Lo Coco, G.
    Guarnaccia, C.
    Fanale, D.
    Calo, V.
    Russo, A.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2017, 26 (05) : 999 - 1007
  • [13] Selecting Patients with Ovarian Cancer for Germline BRCA Mutation Testing: Findings from Guidelines and a Systematic Literature Review
    Eccles, Diana M.
    Balmana, Judith
    Clune, Joe
    Ehlken, Birgit
    Gohlke, Annegret
    Hirst, Ceri
    Potter, Danielle
    Schroeder, Claudia
    Tyczynski, Jerzy E.
    Garcia, Encarnacion B. Gomez
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2016, 33 (02) : 129 - 150
  • [14] BRCA testing of breast cancer patients: medical specialists' referral patterns, knowledge and attitudes to genetic testing
    van Riel, E.
    Warlam-Rodenhuis, C. C.
    Verhoef, S.
    Rutgers, E. J. Th.
    Ausems, M. G. E. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2010, 19 (03) : 369 - 376
  • [15] Psychological distress following multi-gene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk
    Carlsson, Lindsay
    Bedard, Philippe L.
    Kim, Raymond H.
    Metcalfe, Kelly
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2025, 34 (02)
  • [16] The psychological impact of breast and ovarian cancer preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
    Borreani, C.
    Manoukian, S.
    Bianchi, E.
    Brunelli, C.
    Peissel, B.
    Caruso, A.
    Morasso, G.
    Pierotti, M. A.
    CLINICAL GENETICS, 2014, 85 (01) : 7 - 15
  • [17] Current perspectives on recommendations for BRCA genetic testing in ovarian cancer patients
    Vergote, Ignace
    Banerjee, Susana
    Gerdes, Anne-Marie
    van Asperen, Christi
    Marth, Christian
    Vaz, Fatima
    Ray-Coquard, Isabelle
    Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique
    Gonzalez-Martin, Antonio
    Sehouli, Jalid
    Colombo, Nicoletta
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 69 : 127 - 134
  • [18] Identification of Patients at High Risk of Psychological Distress After BRCA1 Genetic Testing
    Ertmanski, Slawomir
    Metcalfe, Kelly
    Trempala, Janusz
    Glowacka, Maria Danuta
    Lubinski, Jan
    Narod, Steven A.
    Gronwald, Jacek
    GENETIC TESTING AND MOLECULAR BIOMARKERS, 2009, 13 (03) : 325 - 330
  • [19] Psychological distress and its correlates in ovarian cancer: a systematic review
    Arden-Close, Emily
    Gidron, Yori
    Moss-Morris, Rona
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2008, 17 (11) : 1061 - 1072
  • [20] UK BRCA mutation testing in patients with ovarian cancer
    Angela George
    British Journal of Cancer, 2015, 113 : S17 - S21