In-stent fractional flow reserve variations and related optical coherence tomography findings: the FFR-OCT co-registration study

被引:6
|
作者
Pyxaras, Stylianos A. [1 ,2 ]
Adriaenssens, Tom [3 ,4 ]
Barbato, Emanuele [1 ]
Ughi, Giovanni Jacopo [3 ,4 ]
Di Serafino, Luigi [1 ]
De Vroey, Frederic [1 ]
Toth, Gabor [5 ]
Tu, Shengxian [6 ,7 ]
Reiber, Johan H. C. [6 ]
Bax, Jeroen J. [8 ]
Wijns, William [1 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] OLV Clin, Cardiovasc Res Ctr Aalst, Aalst, Belgium
[2] Landshut Achdorf Hosp, Med Klin 1, Landshut, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Leuven, Cardiovasc Dis, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Cardiovasc Sci, Leuven, Belgium
[5] Univ Heart Ctr Graz, Graz, Austria
[6] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Div Image Proc, Leiden, Netherlands
[7] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Biomed Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[8] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Heart & Lung Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[9] Natl Univ Ireland, Lambe Inst Translat Med & Curam, Univ Rd, Galway, Ireland
[10] Saolta Univ Healthcare Grp, Galway, Ireland
关键词
Fractional flow reserve; Optical coherence tomography; Stable coronary artery disease; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Drug-eluting stent; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; FOLLOW-UP; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; DIFFUSE ATHEROSCLEROSIS; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; MEDICAL THERAPY; ANGIOGRAPHY; DEPLOYMENT; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s10554-017-1262-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We sought to assess in-stent variations in fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and to associate any drop in FFR with findings by optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging. Suboptimal post-PCI FFR values were previously associated with poor outcomes. It is not known to which extent in-stent pressure loss contributes to reduced FFR. In this single-arm observational study, 26 patients who previously underwent PCI with drug-eluting stent or scaffold implantation were enrolled. Motorized FFR pullback during continuous intravenous adenosine infusion and OCT assessments was performed. Post-PCI FFR < 0.94 was defined as suboptimal. At a median of 63 days after PCI (interquartile range: 59-64 days), 18 out of 26 patients (72%) had suboptimal FFR. The in-stent drop in FFR was significantly higher in patients with suboptimal FFR vs. patients with optimal FFR (0.08 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.01 +/- 0.02, p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that an in-stent FFR variation of > 0.03 was associated with suboptimal FFR. In patients with suboptimal FFR, the OCT analyses revealed higher mean neointimal area (respectively: 1.06 +/- 0.80 vs. 0.51 +/- 0.23 mm(2); p = 0.018) and higher neointimal thickness of covered struts (respectively 0.11 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.06 +/- 0.01 mm; p = 0.021). Suboptimal FFR values following stent-implantation are mainly caused by significant in-stent pressure loss during hyperemia. This finding is associated to a larger neointimal proliferation.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 502
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [21] Healing responses after bifurcation stenting with the dedicated TRYTON side-branch stent in combination with XIENCE-V stents: A clinical, angiography, fractional flow reserve, and optical coherence tomography study: The PYTON (Prospective evaluation of the TRYTON side-branch stent with an additional XIENCE-v everolimus-eluting stent in coronary bifurcation lesions) study
    Dubois, Christophe
    Adriaenssens, Tom
    Ughi, Giovanni
    Wiyono, Stefanus
    Bennett, Johan
    Coosemans, Mark
    Ferdinande, Bert
    Sinnaeve, Peter
    D'hooge, Jan
    Desmet, Walter
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 81 (03) : E155 - E164