Glasgow-Blatchford Score Predicts Post-Discharge Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure

被引:2
作者
Hotsuki, Yu [1 ]
Sato, Yu [1 ]
Yoshihisa, Akiomi [1 ,2 ]
Watanabe, Koichiro [1 ]
Kimishima, Yusuke [1 ]
Kiko, Takatoyo [1 ]
Yokokawa, Tetsuro [1 ]
Misaka, Tomofumi [1 ,2 ]
Sato, Takamasa [1 ]
Kaneshiro, Takashi [1 ]
Oikawa, Masayoshi [1 ]
Kobayashi, Atsushi [1 ]
Yamaki, Takayoshi [1 ]
Kunii, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Nakazato, Kazuhiko [1 ]
Takeishi, Yasuchika [1 ]
机构
[1] Fukushima Med Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Fukushima 9601247, Japan
[2] Fukushima Med Univ, Dept Adv Cardiac Therapeut, Fukushima 9601247, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Glasgow-Blatchford Score; gastrointestinal bleeding; management; prognosis; heart failure; ROCKALL SCORE; ANEMIA; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; AIMS65; NEED;
D O I
10.3390/jcm9124083
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS) is one of the most widely used scoring systems for predicting clinical outcomes for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). However, the clinical significance of the GBS in predicting GIB in patients with heart failure (HF) remains unclear. Methods and Results: We conducted a prospective observational study in which we collected the clinical data of a total of 2236 patients (1130 men, median 70 years old) who were admitted to Fukushima Medical University Hospital for acute decompensated HF. During the post-discharge follow-up period of a median of 1235 days, seventy-eight (3.5%) patients experienced GIB. The GBS was calculated based on blood urea nitrogen, hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and history of hepatic disease. The survival classification and regression tree analysis revealed that the accurate cut-off point of the GBS in predicting post-discharge GIB was six points. The patients were divided into two groups: the high GBS group (GBS > 6, n = 702, 31.4%) and the low GBS group (GBS <= 6, n = 1534, 68.6%). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that GIB rates were higher in the high GBS group than in the low GBS group. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis adjusted for age, malignant tumor, and albumin indicated that a high GBS was an independent predictor of GIB (hazards ratio 2.258, 95% confidence interval 1.326-3.845, p = 0.003). Conclusions: A high GBS is an independent predictor and useful risk stratification score of post-discharge GIB in patients with HF.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High Glasgow Blatchford Score at admission is associated with recurrent bleeding after discharge for patients hospitalized with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Sengupta, Neil
    Tapper, Elliot B.
    Patwardhan, Vilas R.
    Ketwaroo, Gyanprakash A.
    Thaker, Adarsh M.
    Leffler, Daniel A.
    Feuerstein, Joseph D.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 48 (01) : 9 - 15
  • [2] Semiautomated Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score helps direct bed placement for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Schembre, Drew B.
    Ely, Robson E.
    Connolly, Janice M.
    Padhya, Kunjali T.
    Sharda, Rohit
    Brandabur, John J.
    BMJ OPEN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 7 (01):
  • [3] External validation and comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford score, modified Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score and AIMS65 score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a cross-sectional observational study in Western Switzerland
    Rivieri, Sirio
    Carron, Pierre-Nicolas
    Schoepfer, Alain
    Ageron, Francois-Xavier
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 30 (01) : 32 - 39
  • [4] Both Full Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Modified Glasgow-Blatchford Score Predict the Need for Intervention and Mortality in Patients with Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding
    Ur-Rahman, Asad
    Guan, Jian
    Khalid, Sameen
    Munaf, Alvina
    Sharbatji, Mohammad
    Idrisov, Evgeny
    He, Xiaoping
    Machavarapu, Archana
    Abusaada, Khalid
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2018, 63 (11) : 3020 - 3025
  • [5] Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall Scores for prediction of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding outcomes in Chinese patients
    Lu, Mingliang
    Sun, Gang
    Huang, Hua
    Zhang, Xiaomei
    Xu, Youqing
    Chen, Shiyao
    Song, Ying
    Li, Xueliang
    Lv, Bin
    Ren, Jianlin
    Chen, Xueqing
    Zhang, Hui
    Mo, Chen
    Wang, Yanzhi
    Yang, Yunsheng
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (21)
  • [6] Risk stratifying patients with non-varicosic upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage using the Glasgow-Blatchford score: A case series of 91 patients
    Maghrebi, Houcine
    Beji, Hazem
    Haddad, Anis
    Sebai, Amine
    Safraoui, Samia
    Hafi, Maroua
    Laabidi, Asma
    Jouini, Mohamed
    Kacem, Montasser Jamel
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 78
  • [7] AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study
    Arya, P. V. Akhila
    Thulaseedharan, N. K.
    Raj, Rishi
    Unnikrishnan, Dileep C. C.
    Jacob, Aasems
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 42 (04) : 496 - 504
  • [8] Correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding
    Yang, Hong
    Pan, Chen
    Liu, Qi
    Wang, Yan
    Liu, Zhe
    Cao, Xian
    Lei, Jingjing
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 50 (04) : 706 - 712
  • [9] Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford score and full Rockall score systems to predict clinical outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Mokhtare, Marjan
    Bozorgi, Vida
    Agah, Shahram
    Nikkhah, Mehdi
    Faghihi, Amirhossein
    Boghratian, Amirhossein
    Shalbaf, Neda
    Khanlari, Abbas
    Seifmanesh, Hamidreza
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 9 : 337 - 343
  • [10] Comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems for the prediction of the risk of in-hospital death among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Lu, Xuefeng
    Zhang, Xiaojie
    Chen, Hong
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2020, 112 (06) : 467 - 473