Understanding the Differences Between Oncology Patients and Oncology Health Professionals Concerning Spirituality/Religiosity A Cross-Sectional Study

被引:19
作者
de Camargos, Mayara Goulart [1 ,2 ]
Paiva, Carlos Eduardo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Barroso, Eliane Marcon [2 ]
Carneseca, Estela Cristina [1 ,2 ]
Ribeiro Paiva, Bianca Sakamoto [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Barretos Canc Hosp, Ctr Researcher Support, Inst Educ & Res, Barretos, Brazil
[2] Barretos Canc Hosp, Res Grp Palliat Care & Hlth Related Qual Life GPQ, Barretos, Brazil
[3] Barretos Canc Hosp, Dept Clin Oncol, Div Breast & Gynecol, Barretos, Brazil
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ADVANCED CANCER; SPIRITUAL CARE; PALLIATIVE CARE; RELIGION; END; RELIGIOSITY/SPIRITUALITY; ASSOCIATIONS; BELIEFS; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000002145
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This study investigated whether spirituality/religiosity (S/R) plays an important role in the lives of cancer patients and in the work of health professionals who provide care for these patients. The correlations between spiritual quality of life (QOL) and the other QOL domain scores of patients and health professionals were also assessed. Moreover, QOL domain scores were compared between patients and health professionals. In this cross-sectional study, 1050 participants (525 oncology patients and 525 health professionals) were interviewed. Quality of life was assessed with the World Health Organization quality of life spiritual, religious, and personal beliefs (WHOQOL-SRPB). To compare the groups with respect to the instruments' domains, a quantile regression and an analysis of covariance model were used. The WHOQOL-Bref and WHOQOL-SRPB domains were correlated by performing Pearson and partial correlation tests. It was demonstrated that 94.1% of patients considered it important that health professionals addressed their spiritual beliefs, and 99.2% of patients relied on S/R to face cancer. Approximately, 99.6% of the patients reported that S/R support is necessary during cancer treatment; 98.3% of health professionals agreed that spiritual and religious support was necessary for oncology patients. Positive correlations between spiritual QOL and the other QOL domains were observed. When compared among themselves, patients exhibited significantly higher levels of spiritual QOL. In conclusion, S/R was an important construct in the minds of cancer patients and health professionals. Both groups often use S/R resources in their daily lives, which seems to positively affect their perceptions of QOL. Further studies are needed to determine how health professionals effectively address S/R during oncology practice.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J RELIG HLTH
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, WHOQOL SRPB US MAN S
[3]  
[Anonymous], J RELIG HLTH
[4]  
[Anonymous], SOC SCI MED
[5]  
[Anonymous], BR J NURS
[6]  
[Anonymous], INT J BEHAV MED
[7]  
Atef-vahid MK, 2011, J RES MED SCI, V16, P928
[8]   Nurse and Physician Barriers to Spiritual Care Provision at the End of Life [J].
Balboni, Michael J. ;
Sullivan, Adam ;
Enzinger, Andrea C. ;
Epstein-Peterson, Zachary D. ;
Tseng, Yolanda D. ;
Mitchell, Christine ;
Niska, Joshua ;
Zollfrank, Angelika ;
VanderWeele, Tyler J. ;
Balboni, Tracy A. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2014, 48 (03) :400-410
[9]   Why Is Spiritual Care Infrequent at the End of Life? Spiritual Care Perceptions Among Patients, Nurses, and Physicians and the Role of Training [J].
Balboni, Michael J. ;
Sullivan, Adam ;
Amobi, Adaugo ;
Phelps, Andrea C. ;
Gorman, Daniel P. ;
Zollfrank, Angelika ;
Peteet, John R. ;
Prigerson, Holly G. ;
VanderWeele, Tyler J. ;
Balboni, Tracy A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (04) :461-467
[10]   "It Depends": Viewpoints of Patients, Physicians, and Nurses on Patient-Practitioner Prayer in the Setting of Advanced Cancer [J].
Balboni, Michael J. ;
Babar, Amenah ;
Dillinger, Jennifer ;
Phelps, Andrea C. ;
George, Emily ;
Block, Susan D. ;
Kachnic, Lisa ;
Hunt, Jessica ;
Peteet, John ;
Prigerson, Holly G. ;
VanderWeele, Tyler J. ;
Balboni, Tracy A. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2011, 41 (05) :836-847