Primary and Revision Posterior Lumbar Fusion Have Similar Short-Term Complication Rates

被引:18
作者
Basques, Bryce A. [1 ]
Diaz-Collado, Pablo J. [2 ]
Geddes, Benjamin J. [2 ]
Samuel, Andre M. [2 ]
Lukasiewicz, Adam M. [2 ]
Webb, Matthew L. [2 ]
Bohl, Daniel D. [1 ]
Ahn, Junyoung [1 ]
Singh, Kern [1 ]
Grauer, Jonathan N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped & Rehabil, 800 Howard Ave, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
关键词
blood transfusion; fusion; lumbar; national surgical quality improvement program; primary; readmission; revision; SPINAL-FUSION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMMON OUTCOMES; MORTALITY; SURGERY; PROGRAM; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000001094
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design.Retrospective cohort study.Objective.To compare short-term morbidity for primary and revision posterior lumbar fusions.Summary of Background Data.Revision lumbar fusions are unfortunately relatively common. Previous studies have described an increased risk of postoperative complications after revision lumbar fusion; however, these studies have been limited by small sample sizes, poor data quality, and/or narrow outcome measures. There is a need to validate these findings using a high-quality, national cohort of patients to have an accurate assessment of the relative risk of revision posterior lumbar fusions compared with primary lumbar fusion.Methods.The prospectively-collected American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients that underwent undergoing primary and revision posterior lumbar fusion from 2005 to 2013. The occurrence of individual and aggregated postoperative complications within 30 days, along with rates of blood transfusion and readmission, were compared between primary and revision procedures using bivariate and multivariate Poisson regression with robust error variance to control for patient and operative characteristics. Operative time and postoperative length of stay were compared between groups using bivariate and multivariate linear regression.Results.Of the 14,873 posterior lumbar fusion procedures that met inclusion criteria, 1287 (8.7%) were revision cases. There were no differences in the rates of 30-day postoperative complications or readmission between primary and revision posterior lumbar fusion using multivariate analysis to control for patient and operative characteristics. Similarly, no significant differences were found for operative time or postoperative length of stay. There was an increased rate of blood transfusion for revision surgery compared with primary surgery (relative risk 1.4, P<0.001).Conclusion.This study suggests that revision posterior lumbar fusion does not carry significantly increased risk of complications or readmission compared with a primary posterior lumbar fusion. Patients undergoing revision surgery were more likely to receive a blood transfusion. This information suggests that general health risk stratification for revision procedures can be similar to that considered for primary cases.Level of Evidence: 3
引用
收藏
页码:E101 / E106
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2015, HLTH CAR REP COMP 20
[2]  
American College of Surgeons, 2014, US GUID 2013 ACS NSQ
[3]   Variations in Data Collection Methods Between National Databases Affect Study Results: A Comparison of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Databases for Lumbar Spine Fusion Procedures [J].
Bohl, Daniel D. ;
Russo, Glenn S. ;
Basques, Bryce A. ;
Golinvaux, Nicholas S. ;
Fu, Michael C. ;
Long, William D., III ;
Grauer, Jonathan N. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 96A (23) :e193
[4]   Early Complications Related to Approach in Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Single Center Prospective Study [J].
Campbell, Peter G. ;
Malone, Jennifer ;
Yadla, Sanjay ;
Maltenfort, Mitchell G. ;
Harrop, James S. ;
Sharan, Ashwini D. ;
Ratliff, John K. .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 73 (04) :395-401
[5]   Differentiating minimum clinically important difference for primary and revision lumbar fusion surgeries Clinical article [J].
Carreon, Leah Y. ;
Bratcher, Kelly R. ;
Canan, Chelsea E. ;
Burke, Lauren O. ;
Djurasovic, Mladen ;
Glassman, Steven D. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2013, 18 (01) :102-106
[6]   Revision Spinal Fusion in Patients Older Than 75 [J].
Chang, Michael S. ;
Chang, Yu-Hui H. ;
Revella, Jan ;
Crandall, Dennis G. .
SPINE, 2014, 39 (01) :E35-E39
[7]   Association of Hospital Participation in a Surgical Outcomes Monitoring Program With Inpatient Complications and Mortality [J].
Etzioni, David A. ;
Wasif, Nabil ;
Dueck, Amylou C. ;
Cima, Robert R. ;
Hohmann, Samuel F. ;
Naessens, James M. ;
Mathur, Amit K. ;
Habermann, Elizabeth B. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 313 (05) :505-511
[8]   Model-based estimation of relative risks and other epidemiologic measures in studies of common outcomes and in case-control studies [J].
Greenland, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 160 (04) :301-305
[9]  
Herkowitz, 1995, J Am Acad Orthop Surg, V3, P123
[10]   Infection risk for primary and revision instrumented lumbar spine fusion in the Medicare population Clinical article [J].
Kurtz, Steven M. ;
Lau, Edmund ;
Ong, Kevin L. ;
Carreon, Leah ;
Watson, Heather ;
Albert, Todd ;
Glassman, Steven .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2012, 17 (04) :342-347