Evaluating the content validity of generic preference-based measures for use in Parkinson's disease

被引:10
|
作者
Kuspinar, Ayse [1 ]
Mate, Kedar [2 ]
Lafontaine, Anne-Louise [3 ,4 ]
Mayo, Nancy [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Sch Rehabil Sci, 1400 Main St W, Hamilton, ON L8S 1C7, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Hlth Ctr, Res Inst, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Hlth Ctr, Neurol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Parkinson disease; Quality of life; Patient reported outcome measures; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; NONMOTOR SYMPTOMS; HEALTH; MULTIATTRIBUTE;
D O I
10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.01.014
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Generic preference-based measures are used to assess the cost-utility of different interventions in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the difficulty of using them in people with a particular health condition is that these measures may not encapsulate all of the domains that are impacted by the disease. Objective: To contribute evidence towards the content validity of generic preference-based measures in people with PD. Methods: Participants with PD were interviewed on a personalized measure of quality of life, the Patient Generated Index (PGI). The domains identified with the PGI were then categorized using the WHO's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. The extent to which the generic measures (EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D, HUI II, and HUI III) included domains important to persons with PD was qualitatively evaluated. Results: The study included seventy-six participants with PD (mean age 69 years). Dexterity, the top domain nominated by participants, was only included in 1 out of 4 of the generic measures. Fatigue, another commonly reported problem, was not included in 3 out of 4 measures. Sleep, dyskinesia and bowel/bladder problems were not included in any of the measures. Conclusion: Content validity is an essential step in the evaluation of whether a questionnaire truly measures the construct it purports to measure, in this case the construct being health related quality of life (HRQL). This study evaluated the content validity of the EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D, HUI II and HUI III in people with PD, and demonstrated that several important PD specific domains are missing from these measures.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 116
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Adapting preference-based utility measures to capture the impact of cancer treatment-related symptoms
    Shah, Koonal K.
    Bennett, Bryan
    Lenny, Andrew
    Longworth, Louise
    Brazier, John E.
    Oppe, Mark
    Pickard, A. Simon
    Shaw, James W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2021, 22 (08) : 1301 - 1309
  • [42] Common Scale Valuations across Different Preference-Based Measures: Estimation Using Rank Data
    Alava, Monica Hernandez
    Brazier, John
    Rowen, Donna
    Tsuchiya, Aki
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2013, 33 (06) : 839 - 852
  • [43] Modeling a Preference-Based Index for Two Condition-Specific Measures (Asthma and Overactive Bladder) Using a Nonparametric Bayesian Method
    Kharroubi, Samer A.
    Brazier, John E.
    Yang, Yaling
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (04) : 406 - 415
  • [44] The ability of cancer-specific and generic preference-based instruments to discriminate across clinical and self-reported measures of cancer severities
    Paulos Teckle
    Stuart Peacock
    Helen McTaggart-Cowan
    Kim van der Hoek
    Stephen Chia
    Barb Melosky
    Karen Gelmon
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9
  • [45] The Role of Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measures in Health Technology Assessment
    Rowen, Donna
    Brazier, John
    Ara, Roberta
    Zouraq, Ismail Azzabi
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2017, 35 : S33 - S41
  • [46] Challenges in the validation of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life
    Nease, RF
    MEDICAL CARE, 2000, 38 (09) : 155 - 159
  • [47] Developing and testing methods for deriving preference-based measures of health from condition-specific measures (and other patient-based measures of outcome) Introduction
    Brazier, J. E.
    Rowen, D.
    Mavranezouli, I.
    Tsuchiya, A.
    Young, T.
    Yang, Y.
    Barkham, M.
    Ibbotson, R.
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2012, 16 (32) : 1 - +
  • [48] Developing preference-based measures for diabetes: DHP-3D and DHP-5D
    Mulhern, B.
    Labeit, A.
    Rowen, D.
    Knowles, E.
    Meadows, K.
    Elliott, J.
    Brazier, J.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2017, 34 (09) : 1264 - 1275
  • [49] Should Linking Replace Regression When Mapping from Profile-Based Measures to Preference-Based Measures?
    Fayers, Peter M.
    Hays, Ron D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (02) : 261 - 265
  • [50] Correspondence between symptoms and preference-based health status measures in the STOP study
    Gold, Laura S.
    Patrick, Donald L.
    Hansen, Ryan N.
    Beckett, Valeria
    Goss, Christopher H.
    Kessler, Larry
    JOURNAL OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS, 2019, 18 (02) : 251 - 264