Evaluating the content validity of generic preference-based measures for use in Parkinson's disease

被引:10
|
作者
Kuspinar, Ayse [1 ]
Mate, Kedar [2 ]
Lafontaine, Anne-Louise [3 ,4 ]
Mayo, Nancy [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Sch Rehabil Sci, 1400 Main St W, Hamilton, ON L8S 1C7, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Hlth Ctr, Res Inst, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Hlth Ctr, Neurol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Parkinson disease; Quality of life; Patient reported outcome measures; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; NONMOTOR SYMPTOMS; HEALTH; MULTIATTRIBUTE;
D O I
10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.01.014
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Generic preference-based measures are used to assess the cost-utility of different interventions in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the difficulty of using them in people with a particular health condition is that these measures may not encapsulate all of the domains that are impacted by the disease. Objective: To contribute evidence towards the content validity of generic preference-based measures in people with PD. Methods: Participants with PD were interviewed on a personalized measure of quality of life, the Patient Generated Index (PGI). The domains identified with the PGI were then categorized using the WHO's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. The extent to which the generic measures (EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D, HUI II, and HUI III) included domains important to persons with PD was qualitatively evaluated. Results: The study included seventy-six participants with PD (mean age 69 years). Dexterity, the top domain nominated by participants, was only included in 1 out of 4 of the generic measures. Fatigue, another commonly reported problem, was not included in 3 out of 4 measures. Sleep, dyskinesia and bowel/bladder problems were not included in any of the measures. Conclusion: Content validity is an essential step in the evaluation of whether a questionnaire truly measures the construct it purports to measure, in this case the construct being health related quality of life (HRQL). This study evaluated the content validity of the EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D, HUI II and HUI III in people with PD, and demonstrated that several important PD specific domains are missing from these measures.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 116
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using preference-based measures to assess quality of life in stuttering
    Bramlett, RE
    Bothe, AK
    Franic, DM
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2006, 49 (02): : 381 - 394
  • [32] Content validity for dementia of three generic preference based health related quality of life instruments
    Silberfeld, M
    Rueda, S
    Krahn, M
    Naglie, G
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2002, 11 (01) : 71 - 79
  • [33] Criteria for item selection for a preference-based measure for use in economic evaluation
    Peasgood, Tessa
    Mukuria, Clara
    Carlton, Jill
    Connell, Janice
    Brazier, John
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (05) : 1425 - 1432
  • [34] Preference-based measures of health-related quality of life in congenital mobility impairment: a systematic review of validity and responsiveness
    Bray, Nathan
    Spencer, Llinos Haf
    Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor
    HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [35] Preference-based measures of health-related quality of life in congenital mobility impairment: a systematic review of validity and responsiveness
    Nathan Bray
    Llinos Haf Spencer
    Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
    Health Economics Review, 10
  • [36] Comparing Generic and Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measures in Epilepsy: EQ-5D-3L and NEWQOL-6D
    Mulhern, Brendan
    Pink, Joshua
    Rowen, Donna
    Borghs, Simon
    Butt, Thomas
    Hughes, Dyfrig
    Marson, Antony
    Brazier, John
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (04) : 687 - 693
  • [37] Preference-based quality-of-life measures for neocortical epilepsy surgery
    Knowlton, Robert C.
    Kar, Jitesh
    Miller, Suzanne
    Limdi, Nita
    Elgavish, Rotem
    Gilliam, Frank G.
    Riley, Kristen
    Howell, Jennifer
    Kilgore, Meredith
    EPILEPSIA, 2011, 52 (05) : 1018 - 1020
  • [38] PREFERENCE-BASED CONDITION-SPECIFIC MEASURES OF HEALTH: WHAT HAPPENS TO CROSS PROGRAMME COMPARABILITY?
    Brazier, John
    Tsuchiya, Aki
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2010, 19 (02) : 125 - 129
  • [39] Psychometric Properties of Preference-Based Measures for Economic Evaluation in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Systematic Review
    Peters, Nicole
    Dal Bello-Haas, Vanina
    Packham, Tara
    Mehdipour, Ava
    Kuspinar, Ayse
    NEUROLOGY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021
  • [40] Estimating Preference-Based Single Index Measures for Dementia Using DEMQOL and DEMQOL-Proxy
    Rowen, Donna
    Mulhern, Brendan
    Banerjee, Sube
    van Hout, Ben
    Young, Tracey A.
    Knapp, Martin
    Smith, Sarah C.
    Lamping, Donna L.
    Brazier, John E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (02) : 346 - 356